posted
Many criticisms have been levied upon me about a double standard about nudity. The claim is that I will all nudity of black/Asian but not of white women. These claims are unwarned for I have recieved claims of posters being offended by the Nudity. I think some have latched on to the fact I said that I will allow ''tribal'' nudity from which many interpret this statement wrong. But where is the line between decency and indecency with the posts of nude pictures?
Egyptsearch posters feel free to chime in.
Doug M Member # 7650
posted
"Tribal" people who are naked/half naked as part of their normal everyday culture are not pornographic as the nudity is not intended to bring about arousal or sexual attraction.
Pornography is the display of nudity explicitly for the purposes of sexual arousal.
That is the difference.
Go to a Pacific island and grip up one of those half naked ladies and see what happens to you.
Brada-Anansi Member # 16371
posted
I am bias, pics with chicks of any sort with decent bods OK!! show no uncovered punnany though, (I am ol school like dat!)leave something to the imagination,statues Ok,paintings OK,no pics with nude guys... eeuuu!!,mos def no pics of kids nude I don't care what context too many pervs out there,basically Im good with most things hetocentric..
Doug M Member # 7650
posted
I know in my case, there are times when I post images of nudity but it cannot be helped. The fact is that even as of 100 years ago, there were many cultures where nudity/partial nudity was the norm and therefore when you look at pictures of native people from that time you will often see nudity. Of course that is not intended as pornography. And the same goes today for many cultures in more remote areas of the "third world".
However, a photo of someone from a modern culture where nudity in public is not considered proper conduct is most certainly almost certainly intended as pornography in most cases (but not all).
Heck even in ancient Egypt most women were partially nude most of the time, at least from their own artwork.
ausar Member # 1797
posted
It's not pornographic but it is nudity. Posters have complained about all nude images.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
^I already know what you are.
I asked him because I wanted to see what he was, his rapid exit answered my question.
Brada-Anansi Member # 16371
posted
Mike pics of Chicks with decent bods!! the second pic is ok! and no chicks with extremely flat bootys can't even keep a good swim suit on the hips..get It!!
Doug M Member # 7650
posted
What is the point of it? Those people cannot walk down the street like that because the society does not accept nudity in public. You could certainly show anything needed about the complexion or phenotype of these people without them being nude and such images are available.
Whereas pictures of certain populations in certain places are almost always likely to contain nudity because it is accepted in society and the norm.
Most beaches are not nude beaches and therefore, these images, while not explicitly pornographic are simply offensive to some because again modern society does not accept nudity in public.
And certainly a woman in bed with no clothes on is pornographic.
ausar Member # 1797
posted
The problem is that such pictures are offensive to some posters and that they may be used to shut down websites. I am just doing this because of complaints. Personally, I donot care.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
^Really??
You two lying faggots gotta be kidding!
The U.S. supreme court ruled on this years ago.
ausar - Quote: may be used to shut down websites.
That you would try to justify your racism with a foolish lie like that, only speaks to your stupidity.
ausar Member # 1797
posted
Mike you are speaking with emotion and not logic. Give me a logical reason why nudity of any kind should be allowed on the forum. This website is not for adults only so nudity is not really allowed.
DHDoxies Member # 19701
posted
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Really??
You two lying faggots gotta be kidding!
The U.S. supreme court ruled on this years ago.
ausar - Quote: may be used to shut down websites.
That you would try to justify your racism with a foolish lie like that, only speaks to your stupidity.
Mikey boy you are no one to bash anyone for lying or racism. Besides AfricanOlmec you are the most racist member here besides of course Clyde, Marc, IronLion, Edmond, Dana,and the rest of your black racist history stealing ilk.
DHDoxies Member # 19701
posted
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Really??
You two lying faggots gotta be kidding!
The U.S. supreme court ruled on this years ago.
ausar - Quote: may be used to shut down websites.
That you would try to justify your racism with a foolish lie like that, only speaks to your stupidity.
Mikey boy you are no one to bash anyone for lying or racism. Besides AfricanOlmec you are the most racist member here besides of course Clyde, Marc, IronLion, Edmond, Dana,and the rest of your black racist history stealing ilk.
OOOOPS Sorry for the double post Ausar could you please remove this post of mine please?
TruthAndRights Member # 17346
posted
quote:Originally posted by ausar: Mike you are speaking with emotion and not logic. Give me a logical reason why nudity of any kind should be allowed on the forum. This website is not for adults only so nudity is not really allowed.
This is true...there is no disclaimer here on this site for youths under the age of 18 entering the forums...
The argument for or against nudity posting should be about the CONTEXT, as the color of the individual in the photo shouldn't be relevant to the argument. CONTEXT OF THE NUDITY is what should be and is relevant here....To be frank, I have to agree that most of the context with which nudity is posted around here is inappropriate. Again, this site has no disclaimer for youths who may visit the forums. Any adult, especially one with children, would overstand why this could be an issue. Further, if nudity is going to be posted in inappropriate context, there should be a disclaimer on the site stating that the forum may contain offensive and/or nude pictures...due to the good possibility of MINORS viewing the forum, as well as people may view and/or participate in the forum from work during lunch or other breaks and open a thread and BAM there it is, and that can cause a problem for the individual who is viewing...no shortage of employers who ain't having it...
Of course, someone with the emotional maturity of a tween or teenager might not grasp and overstand these logical points too well....
quote:I know in my case, there are times when I post images of nudity but it cannot be helped. The fact is that even as of 100 years ago, there were many cultures where nudity/partial nudity was the norm and therefore when you look at pictures of native people from that time you will often see nudity. Of course that is not intended as pornography. And the same goes today for many cultures in more remote areas of the "third world".
However, a photo of someone from a modern culture where nudity in public is not considered proper conduct is most certainly almost certainly intended as pornography in most cases (but not all).
Heck even in ancient Egypt most women were partially nude most of the time, at least from their own artwork.
posted ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)