...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why Euronuts harass the board! Scary stuff!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] As Rasol has pointed out, racial terms like "Caucasoid" and "negroid" are nothing more than terminological pawns that Eurocentrics love to play and exploit. Hypocrisy and double-standards are the rules and methods which they use these terms. Which is why I totally agreed with Rasol when he calls Eurocentric psuedo-science a fragile house of cards. For example, why is there "true negro" but NEVER a "true caucasian" or "true blanko" as Takruri likes to put it? The fact that the Euronuts ascribe to a "true negro" must mean that there are [i]fake[/i] negroes then! It is these fake negroes that are actually Caucasians or 'Hamites'! [b]LOL[/b] Diop and others have long noted this glaring hypocrisy. How come blonde, blue-eyed Nordics are not 'true blankos' while all other Euros who don't conform to such phenotype, especially dark featured Mediterraneans, are not really blanko or Caucasian at all?? It is all based on the double-standards that so-called "Caucasians" possess phenotypic diversity whereas "Negroes" do not as Anglo-Idiot loves to remind us. It is this double-standard that is perpetuated by the Euronuts, [i]despite[/i] the FACT that genetics has confirmed Africans to possess the **[b]greatest[/b]** diversity! [b]LOL[/b] And then comes the hypocrisy... [QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [qb] 3. Claims of "racial backflow" (however disguised with labels like "EUrasian" or "Middle Eastern") fall short, because those "backflowing" ALREADY RESEMBLED TROPICAL AFRICANS as proved by credible studies. It is hilarious to watch the self-serving hypocrisy of Eurocentrics. When dark-skinned, broad-nosed people with tropical limb proportions are found far west of the Sahara they are firmly "true negroes." WHen similar people are found in Arabia, the SInai or Iraq they comnveniently become "Eurasian." THe bogus "hamitic union" is a prime example of this hypocrisy in operation. [/qb][/QUOTE]Indeed! Features that are considered "true negro" remain as such ONLY when found in West or Central Africa. As soon as they are found in North Africa and [i]especially[/i] outside of Africa, they then become a 'variant' of "Mediterranean Caucasoid" or "Basic White" or "Generalized Modern"!! [b]LOL[/b] Thus early Egyptian skulls despite their "negroid" traits noted by Briggs and Coon were still simply 'Mediterranean' whites. And remember when the Natufians were [URL=http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=003418]first discovered in 1932[/URL], anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith outright described them as "Negroid", yet he was quick to say that they were merely "Negro-like characteristics" in appearance but not [i]really[/i] Negroes! [sic] [b]LOL[/b] Suffice to say, Coon merely says they were a "Mediterraneans with negroid tendencies"! [b]LOL[/b] [b]Brace (2005)[/b] [IMG]http://tinypic.com/eg3539.jpg[/IMG] Note how in the more recent study by Brace above the Natufians are aligned very closely with Niger-Congo speakers of West Africa a.k.a. 'Forest Negroes' a.k.a. 'true Negroes'!! And like that, the house of cards collapses. :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3