...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why I am always on guard, the Albinos and Mulattoes always try.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by jantavanta: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mike111: [QUOTE]Originally posted by jantavanta: [QUOTE]Originally posted by mena7: Jantavanta The origin of Hispanic languages/Dialect.The Ancient Egyptian Language is the mother of Arabic.In Spanish Languages there are 4000 Arabic sounding words.The pre Moorish language of Iberia sounded like Egyptian language.Arabic Egyptian is the source of the Arabic language. Ibn Hazim Arabic scholar of Cordoba state that Aramaic, Hebrew, Arabic was parented and derived from Mudar the Koran language from the Moab region.The Moab region was control by Egypt it was the home of Mudar parent of Arabic.Mudar is short for Medu Neter. Egyptian Romany by Moustafa Gadalla. It look like Canaanite/Kana Anu, Phoenician, Aramaic, Hebrew, Akkadian, Egyptian were dialect of the same language. Hebrew-Bantu people states the so call Semitic languages is Bantu. MTsar states the Hebrew language and Alphabet was the language of the Egyptian Stellar priest. Bobby Hemmitt states the Canaanite/Kana Anu were predynastic Egyptian and the Hebrew were lower Egyptian. They later migrated to West Asia. :) [/QUOTE]I am looking at Iberian Scripts for my first time. They appear to have been derived from Nubian Hieroglyphics. Perhaps it was Marc Washington's article that mentioned Nubian Hieroglyphics. http://www.ancientscripts.com/iberian.html Princess Meritaten, daughter of 18th Dynasty c 1500s B.C. Pharoah Akhenaten had to flee into exile all the way to Scotland after the death of her father, where she was known as Princess Scotia, because Egyptians occupied the whole of southern Europe and considering the theological upheaval he created, she needed to be very far away from her late father's enemies. Pharaoh Akhenaten is the biblical Zoroastranized Moses. [/QUOTE]Both of you are sounding like Firewall. Yes, what you say "Could" be true, but just your saying it, does not "Make" it true, where is your supporting material? [/QUOTE]The name [b]Moses[/b] from Hebrew [b]Moshe[/b] is an abbreviation of the Hebrew adjective [b]mashiyach[/b] , meaning "anointed". An anointed person was a king or ruler in Hebrew era. "Moses" is nickname concealing the identity of a particular Pharaoh who raised a God above all others in other to check the growing influence of the priesthood of other Gods. Akhenaten and Monotheism http://egyptianchristianity.com/akhenaten_and_monotheism.htm WHO WERE NEHEMIAH AND EZRA? WERE THEY JEWS? http://egyptianchristianity.com/ezra_truth_about_hebrew_scriptures.htm By the order of Artaxerxes I (Ardeshir I) (465-424 B.C.) the walls of Jerusalem were built, and two of the royal court officials, Nehemiah and Ezra were commissioned to compile the Judaic dispensation (445-393 B.C.). Most Jews in Palestine did not want to change their religion and their concepts of God and resisted the Persian influence brought to them in the return of the captive Jewish nation from Persia. Nehemiah and Ezra came from Persia to make the Jews adopt this new image of god molded in this Persian way. Because of the Persian protection and favorable attitude of the Achaemenid Kings, the Jews entertained warm feelings thereafter for the Persians and this made them more receptive to their influence. The vast difference between the preexilic and postexilic Judaic scriptures is so discernible that even Sigmund Freud contended that there could have been two Moses. We shall see upon study that innovative teachings of Zarathrustra-Zoroaster had been intermingled with the concepts of the Jew's earlier faith and some of his doctrinal views had been expanded and even altered beyond their originality as we find in Judeo-Christianity today. The new Zoroastrianism at this era, believed in one universal God, Ahura Mazda. But the six divine attributes were often envisioned as separate entities, perhaps in the form of archangels that with Ahura Mazda at the center, at times illogically were called seven Amesha Spenta. There was battle between the forces of good and evil, with the ultimate victory of good over evil. Those who sided with the forces of good, were supporting the Divine cause. The evil forces were regarded as anger, envy, lies and environmental pollution, etc. In effect the Zoroastrian followers had developed a form of angelology and demonology. The Persians believed in liberty and freedom of choice, as reflected in the Gathas and the texts of later Avesta. Another Zoroastrian concept was The Kingdom of God or chosen government, wherein all the virtuous men and women reside freely and choose leaders for their righteousness, and the oppressed will be rehabilitated. The goal was for everyone to work toward establishing the "chosen government" where good overcomes the evil. They believed in immortality of soul, life after death, that the souls of the dead will be judged for their deeds of the past on the bridge of judgement (Chinovat), where they were guided by their conscience and judged by three angels (Mithra, Rashn, Sraosha), who were to differentiate them and determine the eternal dwellings of the two groups in heaven or hell. Resurrection (Rastakhiz) or the end of the world, when the dead revive and the new world will have a fresh life and new beginning (Farsho Kerat or fresh act). In the Gathas, Saoshyant is a general term and means benefactor. There are benefactors of the past, present and future, but no reference is made to any promised person who shall advent. The concept of future benefactors however at this time had been transformed into the savior of future who will perform the task of resurrection. The Israelites on the other hand, based on the preexilic writings had not developed eschatology. They rather believed in Sheol or an underground and desolate world where the good and bad after death will equally end up. Therefore the notions of judgement after death and reward of heaven and retribution of hell, were nonexistent in their tenets. Yahweh was the covenant god of Israelites and did not have a universal status, the dualistic forces of good and evil, angelology and demonology were absent in their beliefs as reflected in the books of preexilic Judaism. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3