...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Stealing Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Firewall: [QB] quote- Corruption is less now in africa then before,it's that certain folks are dismissing or ignoring that part,and that's not right or correct. Another lie that has catch on,is that african do not control their lan and wealth. Yes they do.Many nations in africa are not in control completely of thier wealth or resources but they are mostly in control. That is not that much different that anywhere else in fact. If africans wanted complete control nothing is really stopping them,so there is a reason for this and it has been explained before,so thier is no reason to beat a dead horse. Move on and live your life because the africans are. Some folks do not like the answers,but that's thier problem. Some more good news. I got this from another forum and check out some of the replies below. UNITED STATES special envoy Mr Andrew Young has called for forgiveness and the removal of sanctions on Zimbabwe to ensure the animosity of the past decade ends amicably. Mr Young - who was speaking at a policy dialogue forum organised by the Southern African Political Economy Series on Tuesday in the wake of his meeting with President Mugabe where he conveyed a message of reconciliation from President Barack Obama -- said his visit had been sanctioned by the US Congress and the White House. "It took a decision-making process in the Congress and in the White House for me to come here. "The decision for me to come here was made by the Secretary of State (John Kerry) and approved by the President of the United States." Mr Young was accompanied by US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Mr Reuben Brigety. Analysts say the US overtures, that come in the wake of similar overtures from Britain, the EU and the Commercial Farmers' Union, confirmed that Washington had lost confidence in MDC-T's ability to effect regime change and had bought into the various surveys pointing to a Zanu-PF victory in the forthcoming elections. The US administration's reservations with the MDC-T leadership were exposed in a diplomatic cable dated July 13 2007 which was leaked by whistleblower website WikiLeaks in which the then ambassador to Zimbabwe, Mr Christopher Dell, laid into MDC-T and its leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai as greenhorns. "Zimbabwe's opposition is far from ideal and I leave convinced that had we had different partners, we could have achieved more already. But you have to play the hand you're dealt. "With that in mind, the current leadership has little executive experience and will require massive hand-holding and assistance should they ever come to power," Dell said. Turning to Mr Tsvangirai, Mr Dell said "Tsvangirai is also a flawed figure, not readily open to advice, indecisive and with questionable judgment in selecting those around him. "He is the indispensable element for opposition success, but possibly an albatross around their necks once in power. In short, he is a kind of Lech Walesa character: Zimbabwe needs him, but should not rely on his executive abilities to lead the country's recovery......" [QUOTE=TshabalalaGH;102428398]Continue reading here: http://allafrica.com/stories/201304181236.html Well that was a shift lol[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=BUTEMBO21;102428880]Useless sanctions from a hypocrite. Zimbabwean people did nothing wrong against the US to deserve the sanctions.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Tbite;102429636]I think another reason why they are saying this, is that in spite of all the sanctions the Zimbabwean economy still made progress in many areas. [IMG]http://www.skyscrapercity.com/images/smilies/lol.gif[/IMG] I think that what Mugabe did however was wrong. We had a similar situation in Nigeria - it wasn't whites vs blacks....it was Nigerians vs Nigerians and we handled it, almost as rigorously as Mugabe handled the Zimbabwean situation. However, even though I can understand the reasoning behind the situation in Zimbabwe and the situation in Nigeria. You cannot bring about equitable distribution of resources or education or employment, forcefully. You have to do it systematically. I think land is a little bit more tricky than education, because land becomes monopolized and protected, but land is not an isolated part of the economy. If you had empowered the downtrodden (black people), they would have acquired land anyway. So I don't think that Mugabe had to do things physically, he could have done things a budgetary manner. When the Australian government devotes a certain amount of money to certain people - they simply justify it. If Mugabe had just said - hey look, we are going to concentrate all of our attention on those that need it, that would have been justifiable. But when you begin to do something physically, that is hard to justify.[/QUOTE] To read more replies. http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1615414 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3