...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Recent genetic heritage of modern Europeans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Faheemdunkers: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: First off Cro-Magnon's had no more Caucasoid features than a Shilluk or Turkana. And many black Central East Africans, Maasaai, Samburu, Iraqw, etc do have thin noses - certainly a lot thinner than many European noses.[/QUOTE]A single Pleistocene fossil doesn't exist in Africa with a low nasal index. Thin noses aren't a Negroid trait. Jeeze, you Afronuts can't get that into your thick skulls. If "Blacks" evolved thin noses, where are the fossils? On the contrary, lower nasal indices appeared very late in Africa with the arrival with Caucasoids - the same for wavy hair. [/qb][/QUOTE]No, you are actually the nut. Negroid traits are defined as having broad flat or platyrrhine or chamaerrhine nasal index, and especially with prognathism. And according to that description many black sub-Saharan people in Africa are not NEGROID. GET IT?! Narrow nosed people can hardly be found in the most ancient Egypt because of course those blacks had mostly broad noses w some degree of prognathism, but long narrow noses can be found in places like the Elmenteitan and other cultures created by black Africans. "they are represented by the Gamble's Cave and Naivasha skeletons, as well as the skeleton from Olduvai in northern Tanganyika. They were tall and dolichocephalic, with long face and narrow nose (the 'Elmenteitan type')" from good 'ole Sonia Cole :) Maybe you need to delve more into some of your favorite scientists Coon and Howells, if you don't know about narrow nasal indexes of ancient East African populations as in Elmenteitan culture. Then try to figure out why they are found in their books with names like Races of Europe and Origin of Races. "The role of tall, linearly built populations in eastern Africa's prehistory has always been debated. Traditionally, they are viewed as late migrants into the area. But as there is better palaeoanthropological and linguistic documentation for the earlier presence of these populations than for any other group in eastern Africa, it is far more likely that they are indigenous eastern Africans. ... prehistoric linear populations show resemblances to both Upper Pleistocene eastern African fossils and present-day, non-Bantu-speaking groups in eastern Africa, with minor differences stemming from changes in overall robusticity of the dentition and skeleton. This suggests a longstanding tradition of linear populations in eastern Africa, contributing to the indigenous development of cultural and biological diversity from the Pleistocene up to the present." (L . A . SCHEPARTZ, "Who were the later Pleistocene eastern Africans?" The African Archaeological Review, 6 (1988), pp. 57- 72) “. This is especially clear in the case of individuals from Bromhead's Site, Willey's Kopje, and Nakuru, and the evidence HARDLY SUGGESTS post-Pleistocene domination of the Rift and surrounding territory by "Mediterranean" Caucasoids, as has been claimed. Recent linguistic and archaeological findings are also reviewed, and these seem to support application of the term Nilotic Negro to the early Rift populations." (Rightmire GP. New studies of post-Pleistocene human skeletal remains from the Rift Valley, Kenya. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 May;42(3):351-69. ) BTW - I already mentioned a noted a lot of this in Egypt Child of Africa and I'm really getting tired of having to repeat over and over the confirmation of modern European scholarship. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3