...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
What is a true "Arab" ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: [QB] Genetic studies done on modern Arabic-speakers or Arabians have little to do with the ancient and modern black populations that were the first people to call themselves "Arabs". That is why bringing up genetics is irrelevant, especially when so few studies have been done on the authentic Arabs, i.e. black speakers of Qahtan dialects still occupying Arabia. The question is who were these people related to and not who they mixed with and converted to Islam, Judaism or Christianity. Djehuti had a good point in that it shows they could have been Afro-Asiatic populations who are perhaps closely related to Arab populations of Sudan and who may have contributed their genetic material to other NON-BLACK inhabitants of Levant or southern Asia at some point in the late Holocene. First and foremost, genetics done on a geographical basis is pointless, since the people occupying Arabia are historically documented as having come from Turkey, Persia, Africa and Syria in recent times - JUST LIKE IN EGYPT. If the Egyptians, Arabians and Berbers were not black and kinky haired populations, the early writers from Syria, Persia and Rome. These people have long amalgamated with NON-black people and thus bringing up geographically and linguistically-based genetic studies about modern populations of these people IS POINTLESS. We know that the name refers only to a certain group of semitic speakers that were originally only referred to as black BY SYRIANS that includes the BLACK Nabataeans before they spread THEIR BLACK DIALECT now called ARAMAEAN to Lebanon and Syria. That includes the BLACK Kedar or QIDAR from which they sprang originally and who overran North Arabia. They include the still black SUlaymiyyan Howeitat who call themselves descendants of the BLACK NABATAEANS. That includes the still black QAHTAN or Sabaean tribes of Maddhij, Tayyi, Mahra in modern ARABIA to whom were closely related Kahlan, Azd, Murad, Ruwalla, Ans, Hamdan and Abs before they spread to northern Arabia and Syria and Iraq where they were swamped in NON- ARAB, NON-BLACK populations who now consider themselves "ARABS". I would like anyone to try and prove that a single Arab tribe today calling themselves "ARAB" was not originally derived from the above named people, or that the original of any Arab tribe named in a Central Asian text was not originally referred to as black. We know that the Sabaean civilization was occupied by BLACKS both in Arabia and Africa due to the skeletal evidence and only influenced in late times by Sassanid mercahants around the coasts. That doesn't mean ARABS of the Sabaean people were affiliated with Central Asians or any other non-Arab stock. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3