...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
What is a true "Arab" ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Firewall: [QB] Edited- The early J AND EARLY J1 one speakers were black,that's true,but other later J1 speakers WERE NOT,JUST like the early I dna SPEAKERS were black and europe before whites came about but later I DNA FOLKS WERE NOT BLACK BUT WHITE EUROPEANS. So whites inherited these early dna lineages like J,J1 and I and the dna mutated and theses later subclades FOR Haplogroup I-M170 AND LIKE SECOND J1 and later Mutations/SUBCLADES could be trace back to theses whites,simple. So EURO-ASIAN whites and blacks are both J1,IT'S JUST ABOUT FINDING OUT WHO J1 BELONGS TO WHO. Early dna J1 and J could be still found in THE native population in arabia however,i do not if it's the same for early I. Black never called themselves arabs. Nabataeans were not black the origianal folks were and you have mention there name above. Qahtan are not arabs.They were in arabia before arabs. Sabaean civilization was not arab,it was arabian but not arab,it's like saying ancient egypt was arab just because it's arab today. Dna does not lie,and arabs and hewbrews are cousins,and were original not black and were white invaders of these original black lands. Some of the native population became apart of the these invading arabs. Some of the blacks of arabia were some of the first to become arabized. Dna does not lie,the dna proof is all over place and the info is above and i am clear now what going on then i was before so i disagree with your post,but you are entertaining sometimes. :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3