...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Amur questioning Richard Neave's First European reconstruction
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor: [QB] In the above post there is a minor problem with the European/ African assessment as you can see below. Rwandese crania. [IMG]http://picturestack.com/295/823/y7ZSchermafbeIK4.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://picturestack.com/933/761/H8fSchermafbeR74.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg197/scaled.php?server=197&filename=rwanda4.jpg&res=landing[/IMG] [/QUOTE]therefore Richard Neave might have made the nose in the reconstruction too wide, therefore of all the various people with noses not as wide as the reconstruction, they are now included rather than excluded as possibilities for similarity And if you find a narrower nose in Africa that is a crossover trait that doesn't mean Oase 2 is Rwandan The skull was found in Romania and said to also have Neanderthal traits The distance between Rwanda and Romania is over 3000 miles so showing pictures of Rwandans as a comparison to this skull is a rhetorical distraction, silliness If George Washinton's skull was dug up and somebody posted a photo of it on a webiste but didn't tell you who it was you would go into your African file and start pulling out pictures, that is what you do in every instance [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3