...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Amur questioning Richard Neave's First European reconstruction
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor: Is not what I believe, it what peer reviewed scholarship shows. If that's what you call brutish, well I can't help it. [/QUOTE]you dont know how to debate. You write one sentence " Your theory has a few holes, we can stuff them for you if you are ok with it?" ^^^useless then you go on to quotes and people are supposed to try to figure out what your exact point is. Then we see that same charts and text over and over again and seeing that it;s what we had seen before just skip past it. But it makes threads look bad, xyyman told you about "overload" and Calabooz did too. When you repeat the same info over and over again it just becomes spam [/qb][/QUOTE]You are a sorry excuse of a person. And you wonder why people call you a liar and a fake, a black woman impostor. Remember, this was long before I posted here. And at first I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Sadly you didn't grab this chance. This is why you are the laughing stock of ES. And since you are lost in the arguments and peer reviewed scholarship, you again start to hide behind other posters name. But these poster say the same about you what I just wrote, a few sentences ago. And of course I could give my own interpretation on the studies I am posting myself. But I rather cite, so you can't say I made it up. Like you just did with the flaunts on crania formation, a few posts ago. Xyyman and Calabooz complained about you not posting sources. You must not have understood them correctly. I post to contradict you. If you don't like it, then that's your problem. [QUOTE]Recent investigations into the origins of symbolism indicate that personal ornaments in the form of perforated marine shell beads were used in the Near East, North Africa, and SubSaharan Africa at least 35 ka earlier than any personal ornaments in Europe. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]The first argues that modern cognition is unique to our species and the consequence of a genetic mutation that took place 50 ka in Africa among anatomically modern humans (AMH) (1). [/QUOTE]--Francesco d’Erricoa et al. (2009) Additional evidence on the use of personal ornaments in the Middle Paleolithic of North Africa http://www.pnas.org/content/106/38/16051.full.pdf I understand how you will try to look up contra-arguments here. But I have already more to expel and expose, so it's really an effortless attempt if any. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3