...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Dr. Clyde Winters : The Decipherment of the Olmec Writing System
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] Oh Deceitful One. No where in my quote below do I claim the piece in the Royal Society was peer reviewed Deceitful One. It is just what I said it was, i.e., a letter to the editor which they call an e-letter. In fact the site where you found my letter was labled: . [b] http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1730/884.e-letters [/b] . . [QUOTE]Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Deceitful One speaks again. I am not claiming that my 10-12 Comments to PLoS papers are letters to the editors. My letters to the editors were published by BioEssay and the Proceedings of the Royal Society. These papers were responded to by the authors.[/qb][/QUOTE]We have established that your comments on PLoS Genetics and BioEssays were not peer reviewed and have the letters from the editors to prove it. The next one to fall is you "letter" to the Proceedings of the Royal Society-- BTW Busby never replied to it. Original paper; (submitted May 17 2011; accepted August 17, 2011 i.e peer reviewed) Busby, B. J. et al. 2012 “The Peopling of Europe and the Cautionary Tale of Y Chromosome Lineage R-M 269,” [b]Proceedings of the Royal Society B[/b] 279: 884-892. Winters’ comment: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1730/884.e-letters Winters, C. “The First Europeans were Sub-Saharan Africans,” Published only electronically March 23, 2012 (no date of submission, PLoS Genetics posted one day after submission) Letter from Editorial Staff at Royal Society: peer review Inbox x Bernard Ortiz de Montellano <bodemontellano@gmail.com> Dec 6 (2 days ago) to publishing Dear Sirs: Are e-letters commenting on published articles subjected to peer review before publishing, or are they just routinely vetted by an editor? Thank You, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano Emeritus, Professor of Anthropology Wayne State University Vaughan, Debbie <Debbie.Vaughan@royalsociety.org> 9:47 AM (13 hours ago) to me Hi Bernard The latter: routinely vetted by an editor. Kind regards, Debbie As I pointed out in the beginning anything that Winters submits to quality peer reviewed journals is in the nature of comments which are routinely posted and rate [b]NOT[/b] peer reviewed. The letter from PNAS is coming and predictably will say the same. Watch as more ad-hominem and lots of irrelevant spam follow. [/qb][/QUOTE]You admit the Royal Society piece was a Letter to the editor in your post. [QUOTE][list] [*]Dear Sirs:[b] Are e-letters[/b] commenting on published articles subjected to peer review before publishing, or are they just routinely vetted by an editor? Thank You, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano Emeritus, Professor of Anthropology Wayne State University Vaughan, Debbie <Debbie.Vaughan@royalsociety.org> 9:47 AM (13 hours ago) to me Hi Bernard The latter: routinely vetted by an editor. Kind regards, Debbie [/list] [/QUOTE]. This is why I call you deceitful. You take the truth and try to twist it around to match your own delusions. Instead of admitting that when you write a letter to the editor, you are commenting on a researcher's article, you just say comment, instead of admitting the the comment is called, "eletter" to the editor unless its in the context of the CA format. You make lies your discourse. Truly you are Deceitful. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3