...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
What is Wrong With BLACK PEOPLE ???
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] AngloBufoon/Thule says: [b]"Physically the ancient ancient Egyptians are exactly equal distance of European and that of the African Negro; some populations of the mediterranean on one hand the Horn of Africa (Tigre, Somalia) on the other, fall in the interior of the range of variation of the ancient Egyptians."[/b] Sure in Froment's sample they may be "equal distance" but as he himself admits "Horn of Africa (Tigré and Somalia) fit well into Egyptian variations". The primary cluster is STILL with sub-Saharan Africans, a point confirmed by other studies more current than Froment 1992. You fail again. [b]The idea there is an "African" genetic cluster is totally bogus.[/b] But, you your yourself say they cluster with Africans in the south, and produce a writer that says just that. If the cluster is "non-existent," as you now claim, after having on the same page asserted that it does, then you are not only a very confused individual, but again, have contradicted your own claim, with your own "supporting" reference. [b]"Zones of discontinuity in human gene frequency distributions are present, but the local gradients are so small that they can be identified only by simultaneously studying many loci using complex statistical techniques. In addition, such regions of relatively sharp genetic change do not surround large clusters of populations, on a continental or nearly continental scale. On the contrary, they occur irregularly, within continents and even within single countries." - Barbujani et al. 1997[/b] lol, you fail again. Up above Barbjuani says "they occur" within continents, and we are talking populations inside Africa's Nile Valley. You are trying to divert attention from your earlier failure by "broadening" into a strawman query, but you still fail. Barbujani himself acknowledged clustering of Africans found in other studies, noting that sampling schemes, loci chosen, etc impact results, a point made to you by Badmuntish or whatever he is called now almost 2 years ago. You were debunked then and still are now. Posting the same BS 2 years later in the hope people have forgotten won't save you. Even recent arrival Amun-ra has pointed out glaring errors and contradictions in your claims. But let's take your own writer elsewhere. Quote: [i]With k=6 Rosenberg et al. [49] found genetic clusters corresponding to (1) Africa, (2) Europe, Western Asia and part of Central Asia; (3) the Kalash of Pakistan; (4) East Asia and part of Central Asia; (5) Oceania; and (6) South America. Bamshad et al. [68] observed a separation between Africa and Eurasia with k=2, a split between Asia and Europe with k=3, and two African clusters with k=4, confirming that variation within Africa exceeds that among other continents [57, 69, 70]. [/i] EXCERPT FROM: Human Races: Classifying People vs Understanding Diversity. Current Genomics, 2005, 6, 000-000 Guido Barbujani* Barbjuani noted results can be mixed based on sampling, beginning assumptions, etc but once again, someone you used as a "supporting" reference, debunks your claim that there is no support for such clusters. Your own guy which you referenced says there is. Hapless buffoon! When are you going to learn that the very same "supporting" references you keep using undermine your position? lmao.. [IMG]http://lounge.moviecodec.com/images/attachment/who-here-thinks-that-um-is-pretty-pathetic-and-cold-hearted-5661.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3