...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
White Native Americans (WNA)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] Northern Indians have been on a special mission to deny African relationship to Dravidians , Australians and etc., so I don't try to sugar coat their double-speech. The fact remains, that the data in the Raghaven et al article, does not support the authors conclusions. [/QUOTE ] Yes. Northern East Indians are mainly hindutva (Hindu Nationalists), who are trying to claim that they have always been in India; eventhough they only arrive in India in 1200 BC, using Grey Pottery. Lead by Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Hindutva geneticists are attempting to use genetics to re-write the history of India. . [/qb][/QUOTE]Winters, C. 2008 “Origin and Spread of Dravidian Speakers,”[b] Int J Hum Genet,[/b] 8(4): 325-329 [QUOTE]evidences suggest that the Dravidian speakers formerly lived in Nubia and migrated to India over 5000 years ago.[/QUOTE]This is about 3000 B.C. which one is correct? Why would the following and practically all the population geneticists lie about the Dravidians: Metspalu, Bernardo Arriaza,, Bryan Kemp, Richard Villems, Ted Goebel, and Toomas Kivizild, Rippan Malhi, etc. as the senior authors. Why would they lie about Africa and the Paleoindians? How would they fake the data?[b] [QUOTE] They fake the data on the Dravidians using Bayesian statistics without any archaeological or craniometric evidence to support the statistics. I already illustrated above that they use double speech to create the myth that there was continuity between paleoamericans and modern mongoloid Native Americans. [/qb][/QUOTE]How exactly are they using Bayesian statistics, which deal with probabilities to fake the data which consists of the four bases (A,C,G,T) and their sequence in the DNA? Why would Hindus convince the world authorities on population genetics to lie about the roots of Native Americans? Did the Dravidians go to India 1200 B.C. or more than 3000 B.C.? [/QB][/QUOTE]The Indo-Aryan speakers entered India 1200 BC. It was easy , the Academe was already claiming that East Indians were white, so the claim the Dravidians were not negroes supported a belief they already held. This is all part of the [ white] academy's goal to decrease the number of negro races, by declaring that only Blacks in Africa, are negroes, and Blacks in Eurasia and Australia are different races entirely. This idea is falsified by anthropology, archaeology, craniometrics and linguistics, so scientist are using genetics to isolate the negro in Africa. The major problem with using genetics is that if a researcher reads the literature that discover that the DNA always points back to Africans. So they continually have to give the DNA new nomenclatures to pretend that Africans have not influenced certain populations. The best example is the R clade. Europeans are predominately, R1-M173 and R2. The pristine form of M173 is found in Africa, to separate Africans from the rest of the world that said all African M173, was V88. They they claimed that , a sister clade M269, was evidence of European background, but this haplogroup is carried by just about every African population including Khoisan, Anu (pygmies) and numerous sub-Saharan groups. This indicated that Europeans were not unique carriers of R1. This along with the Dravidians being the major carriers of R2, indicate that this haplogroup is also evidence of African ancestry. This indicates that whites carrying the R haplogroup are descendants of Africans. This reality does not sit well with Europeans--whites--so the scientific community has attempted to move away from the idea that all Blacks are negroes, so they can pretend that certain Blacks, like the Dravidians who carry the Europeans precious R2, are not negroes--but black skinned whites. The mainland Asians, carry Melanesian DNA, so the Melanesians must also be forced out of the classification of Negro. Making Sub-Saharan Africans, the only Negroes, is the only model that make Europeans and Asians unique populations, rather than having to teach the truth, that modern Europeans and Asians are white and yellow skinned NEGROES. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3