...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
peer review demolishes Winters M-173
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [qb] In 1999 potential confusion arose because 2 papers were published that called certain sequences M1. One had to change names, and Phylotree designated that the one carrying M16126 would now be named M3. M1 16129 16189 16249 16311 M3 16126 Thus, it is absolutely clear that, at least since the year 2000, mutation at 16126 has designated haplogroup M3 and mutation at 16129 designates haplogroup M1. This is what you see if you visit phylotre- the official naming site. Is this what you questioned? [/qb][/QUOTE]This argument is invalid. It implies that Phylotree promotes lies to maintain the status quo, and white supremacy. Clearly Phylotree is unreliable and based on Euroocentrism and white supremacy. This is obvious given the way R-M173 in Africa was changed into V88, and 207 in Africa was changed into V45. All of these efforts are simply misdirection aimed at containing Negroes in Africa, and separating Dravidian speakers from Africans. Researchers maintain that the Eastern African HVS-I signature motifs are 16,129, 16,189, 16,249, and 16,311. This motiff is found in Indian M1, so it can not be changed into M3, because M3 already existed. . [IMG]http://olmec98.net/kivisild1999.gif[/IMG] . The presence of one transition, 126, in Indian M1, does not deny its existence as M1, since it is the only M haplogroup outside of Africa that carries the entire M1 motiff. Luckily, we have the original paper that proves that M1 in India exist. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3