posted
Well I belive it was discussed already and brought up on the very site that when they can't lie anymore they pretend its a new discovery. On wikipedia they also mention Gaelic speaking slaves in America of course that implies that there were ancient blacks in the Ireland areas. Logic would point to what Mike says being true, that there was a final race war where blacks from Europe were thrown in and mixed with African slaves, whites can't tell the difference today and they don't care about our history so they dump us all into one category in the history books and on top of this:
I think they are at a point where a lot of nations are looking at them crooked eyed. America race relations are trash and have been forever, its hurting their appearance to an extent. But if they reveal that there was a race war in Europe that will destroy their history and imply that its not a cultural issue but a possibly racial/genetical one. Cause a blood bath in Europe and take over and slowly move out to do it to other places? That's bad racial publicity, it goes beyond nationality at that point.
I think that's why in their media and propaganda they are always victimizing themselves while projecting some of their behaviors on others. "THESE ARE THE THEIVES, THESE ARE THE TERRORISTS, THESE ARE THE RAPERS (ETC)! It CAN'T be us! See?"
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
^Yes, the circle will be unbroken. We did it to Neanderthal: Albinos did it to us: Their Mulattoes will do it to them:
Will it then be our time again?
Mindovermatter Member # 22317
posted
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Yes, the circle will be unbroken. We did it to Neanderthal: Albinos did it to us: Their Mulattoes will do it to them:
Will it then be our time again?
Neanderthals themselves may have been the actual black europeans, they had genes for dark and black skin and were from Africa as Clyde attested before.
Mindovermatter Member # 22317
posted
quote:Originally posted by Fencer: Well I belive it was discussed already and brought up on the very site that when they can't lie anymore they pretend its a new discovery. On wikipedia they also mention Gaelic speaking slaves in America of course that implies that there were ancient blacks in the Ireland areas. Logic would point to what Mike says being true, that there was a final race war where blacks from Europe were thrown in and mixed with African slaves, whites can't tell the difference today and they don't care about our history so they dump us all into one category in the history books and on top of this:
I think they are at a point where a lot of nations are looking at them crooked eyed. America race relations are trash and have been forever, its hurting their appearance to an extent. But if they reveal that there was a race war in Europe that will destroy their history and imply that its not a cultural issue but a possibly racial/genetical one. Cause a blood bath in Europe and take over and slowly move out to do it to other places? That's bad racial publicity, it goes beyond nationality at that point.
I think that's why in their media and propaganda they are always victimizing themselves while projecting some of their behaviors on others. "THESE ARE THE THEIVES, THESE ARE THE TERRORISTS, THESE ARE THE RAPERS (ETC)! It CAN'T be us! See?"
Fencer I think what happened is what many people refuse to accept and which I have described here.
The Indian albino's from Central Asia, or White people, came into black europe in mexican style immigration waves and out-numbered black europeans.
The Blacks of Europe had their own albino black european populations IN EUROPE BUT the black europeans kept them in check and enslaved them before the White people from Central Asia came into Europe.
Once the White people from Central Asia came into Europe, they exerminated the black europeans and their history and sent them off to different places around the world.
Once Europe became depopulated of it's black european population the INDIAN ALBINO WHITE FROM CENTRAL ASIA MIXED WITH THE BLACK EUROPEAN ALBINO POPULATION IN EUROPE TO CREATE THE MODERN WHITE EUROPEAN POPULATION TODAY!
This is explained by the presence OF BOTH HAPLOGROUP R1B AND R1A IN EUROPE IN WHITE EUROPEAN GROUPS! BOTH HAPLOGROUPS HAVE DIFFERENT ORIGINS IN DIFFERENT CONTINENTS!
It's important you understand this idea fencer, because it gives a much clear picture of what happened.
kdolo Member # 21830
posted
Mindovermatter,
We get it. Its kinda like Planet of the Apes......
The Albinos being the Apes.......
I have always thought that the original Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was cleverly disguised allegory about how Whites (represented by the Apes) overthrew their human masters ( historically Black)
Ofcourse, the modern Planet of the Apes movies flips it. The Apes represent Blacks....and Caesar is a Malcom X/Moses type character.
CelticWarrioress Member # 19701
posted
Fencer,
Boy the White people hating, Black racist, Black supremacists are really coming out of the wood work aren't you. First of all ohh Whitey hater, Gaelic is a WHITE language NOT an African one. Mike is as full of crap as you are & as much of a history thief as you are & knows no truth the same as your Whitey hating backside doesn't. You're right we don't give a damn about your history, however you sure care enough about ours to try to steal it & rob White children of theirs don't you. There was NO genocide of Blacks in Europe no taking over of Europe from Blacks, no proof this happened. I'll ask you what I've asked all others of your ilk and still haven't gotten an answer yet. What did White children ever do to you to make you hate them so?
Mindovermatter Member # 22317
posted
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: Mindovermatter,
We get it. Its kinda like Planet of the Apes......
The Albinos being the Apes.......
I have always thought that the original Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was cleverly disguised allegory about how Whites (represented by the Apes) overthrew their human masters ( historically Black)
Ofcourse, the modern Planet of the Apes movies flips it. The Apes represent Blacks....and Caesar is a Malcom X/Moses type character.
Thing is a lot of otherwise knowledgeable people here refuse to accept this idea!
Even though there is loads of genetic evidence that supports my clain IN EUROPE TODAY!
kdolo Member # 21830
posted
Doxie, Fencher is correct about the Gaelic thing.
"The first foreign tongue spoken by some slaves in America was Scottish Gaelic picked up from Gaelic-speakers from the Western Isles.[25] In a North Carolina newspaper dated about 1740, an advertisement offers a generous reward for the capture and return of a runaway African slave who is described as being easy to identify because he only spoke Gaelic.[26] In one church in Alabama the African American congregation worshiped in Gaelic as late as 1918, another indication of the extent to which the Highlanders and Islanders spread their culture, from North Carolina to Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi.[27]" Wiki
Now doesnt this peak your interest Doxie ??
Can u identify the cognitive dissonance ??
Please explain how an African's only language could be Gaelic ??
Looks like Mike is correct .......
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
quote:Originally posted by Mindovermatter:
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: Mindovermatter,
We get it. Its kinda like Planet of the Apes......
The Albinos being the Apes.......
I have always thought that the original Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was cleverly disguised allegory about how Whites (represented by the Apes) overthrew their human masters ( historically Black)
Ofcourse, the modern Planet of the Apes movies flips it. The Apes represent Blacks....and Caesar is a Malcom X/Moses type character.
Thing is a lot of otherwise knowledgeable people here refuse to accept this idea!
Even though there is loads of genetic evidence that supports my clain IN EUROPE TODAY!
Oops, why am I beginning to think this is suppose to be a big con, pulled off by some delusional Albino high-schooler, that's suppose to show how dumb and gullible niggers are.
Mindovermatter is full of sh1t - no sense in trying to humor him.
Ish Gebor Member # 18264
posted
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: Is RealHistoryWWW gaining influece ??
Here Albino's still lie, but admit more than they have been generally willing to ....
DNA study finds London was ethnically diverse from start
"According to Caroline McDonald, who is a senior curator at the museum, London was a cosmopolitan city from the moment it was created following the Roman invasion 2,000 years ago."
What is commonly known.
quote:Established in around AD50, seven years after the Romans invaded Britain, the City, or Square Mile as it has become known, is the place from which modern-day London grew.
The remains of the City’s Roman wall can be seen in various locations, the foundations of the Roman Temple of Mithras have been unearthed here and London’s only Roman Amphitheatre was discovered under Guildhall Art Gallery in 1988.
Its name is derived from the Celtic word Londinios, which means the place of the bold one. After they invaded Britain in 43 AD the Romans built a bridge across the Thames. They later decided it was an excellent place to build a port. The water was deep enough for ocean going ships but it was far enough inland to be safe from Germanic raiders. Around 50 AD Roman merchants built a town by the bridge. So London was born.
Just how far back does this wonderful city's history go? Learn about London's history with Activity Village and enjoy our related activities for children.
A Brief History of London, for Kids
It is thought that London in prehistoric times was merely a collection of scattered rural settlements. Spear heads and weapons from the Bronze and Iron Ages have been found around the Thames, and a recent archaeological dig near Vauxhall discovered evidence of a possible wooden bridge across the Thames around 3,000 years ago!
It was the Romans who were responsible for the city we know today as London. They invaded Britain in AD43, and soon afterwards founded the city of Londinium. It is thought that the original city was small - about the size of Hyde Park!
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Fencer,
Boy the White people hating, Black racist, Black supremacists are really coming out of the wood work aren't you. First of all ohh Whitey hater, Gaelic is a WHITE language NOT an African one. Mike is as full of crap as you are & as much of a history thief as you are & knows no truth the same as your Whitey hating backside doesn't. You're right we don't give a damn about your history, however you sure care enough about ours to try to steal it & rob White children of theirs don't you. There was NO genocide of Blacks in Europe no taking over of Europe from Blacks, no proof this happened. I'll ask you what I've asked all others of your ilk and still haven't gotten an answer yet. What did White children ever do to you to make you hate them so?
Racism indicates power, power to impose upon another. You out of all people here should not speak of others being a supposed racist, with all these loony ouburst by you.
quote: "One was an imposing statue of Mars, the Roman god of war. The other was an ancient bronze tablet, 5 feet wide and 3.5 feet high. It bore numerals in Roman but the words were in Gaulish, the extinct version of Celtic spoken by the inhabitants of France before the Roman conquest in the first century B.C."
[...]
Specialists have long debated which country was the homeland of the Indo-Europeans and whether their language was spread by conquest or because its speakers were the first farmers whose methods and tongue were adopted by other populations. The second theory, that of spread by agriculture, has been advocated by Dr. Colin Renfrew, a Cambridge archaeologist.
Dr. Forster, who works in Dr. Renfrew's institute, said in an interview that the suggested date 8100 B.C. for the arrival of Indo-European in Europe ''does seem to vindicate Renfrew's archaeological idea that the Indo-European languages were spread by farmers.''
I believe that London, then known as Londinium to the Romans was a military fort--which eventually grew into a town.
One question though: the earliest Europeans are the present-day Basques of Northern Spain and Southern France as evidenced by the fact that their language and genetics are unique in Europe. They were hunter-gatherers as is claimed, but though genetically distinct from the rest of Europe except people from Estonia and Lithuania who do share some "hunter-gatherer" genes with them, they are phenotypically identical with other Europeans
I believe that London, then known as Londinium to the Romans was a military fort--which eventually grew into a town.
One question though: the earliest Europeans are the present-day Basques of Northern Spain and Southern France as evidenced by the fact that their language and genetics are unique in Europe. They were hunter-gatherers as is claimed, but though genetically distinct from the rest of Europe except people from Estonia and Lithuania who do share some "hunter-gatherer" genes with them, they are phenotypically identical with other Europeans
Trying to get someone to accept a lie as fact: then using that lie as the foundation of another lie. Your fellow lying Albino falsifiers must be very proud of you.
But really:
You spent 11 years here, in deep cover as a Black African, for THIS?????
Anyway, as we all know, the only thing unique about Basques (as relates to other European Albinos), is that they are terribly INBRED!
We get it. Its kinda like Planet of the Apes......
The Albinos being the Apes.......
I have always thought that the original Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was cleverly disguised allegory about how Whites (represented by the Apes) overthrew their human masters ( historically Black)
Ofcourse, the modern Planet of the Apes movies flips it. The Apes represent Blacks....and Caesar is a Malcom X/Moses type character.
Thing is a lot of otherwise knowledgeable people here refuse to accept this idea!
Even though there is loads of genetic evidence that supports my clain IN EUROPE TODAY!
Oops, why am I beginning to think this is suppose to be a big con, pulled off by some delusional Albino high-schooler, that's suppose to show how dumb and gullible niggers are.
Mindovermatter is full of sh1t - no sense in trying to humor him.
Explain to me how that is unbelievable, when the evidence supports it.
You have two separate main haplogroups in Europe today which have origins in different parts of the world other then Europe, yet it's carriers are almost as albino as snow; IN EUROPE TODAY!
Ish Gebor Member # 18264
posted
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by lamin: Ish Gibor,
I believe that London, then known as Londinium to the Romans was a military fort--which eventually grew into a town.
One question though: the earliest Europeans are the present-day Basques of Northern Spain and Southern France as evidenced by the fact that their language and genetics are unique in Europe. They were hunter-gatherers as is claimed, but though genetically distinct from the rest of Europe except people from Estonia and Lithuania who do share some "hunter-gatherer" genes with them, they are phenotypically identical with other Europeans
Trying to get someone to accept a lie as fact: then using that lie as the foundation of another lie. Your fellow lying Albino falsifiers must be very proud of you.
But really:
You spent 11 years here, in deep cover as a Black African, for THIS?????
Anyway, as we all know, the only thing unique about Basques (as relates to other European Albinos), is that they are terribly INBRED!
--Doron M. Behar, Christine Harmant, [...], and The Genographic Consortium (2012-05-04). "The Basque Paradigm: Genetic Evidence of a Maternal Continuity in the Franco-Cantabrian Region since Pre-Neolithic Times". American Journal of Human Genetics 90 (3): 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.002. PMC 3309182. PMID 22365151.
--Eva Fernández et al.: "Hacia el Origen de los vascos: Secuencias de DNA mitocontrial antiguo del País Vasco"
--Dupandunlop, Isabelle; et al. (2004). "Estimating the impact of prehistoric admixture in the genome of Europeans". Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (7): 1361–1372. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh135. PMID 15044595.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
^He,he,he,he:
Leave it to lioness to find bogus old Albino studies and try to pass them off a legitimate.
Ish Gebor Member # 18264
posted
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Ish Gebor: Shockingly I found this piece of misinformation:
quote: The Basques may be the direct descendants of the Cro-Magnon hunter-gatherers that first lived in Europe about 35,000 years ago.
--Doron M. Behar, Christine Harmant, [...], and The Genographic Consortium (2012-05-04). "The Basque Paradigm: Genetic Evidence of a Maternal Continuity in the Franco-Cantabrian Region since Pre-Neolithic Times". American Journal of Human Genetics 90 (3): 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.002. PMC 3309182. PMID 22365151.
--Eva Fernández et al.: "Hacia el Origen de los vascos: Secuencias de DNA mitocontrial antiguo del País Vasco"
--Dupandunlop, Isabelle; et al. (2004). "Estimating the impact of prehistoric admixture in the genome of Europeans". Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (7): 1361–1372. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh135. PMID 15044595. [/QB]
Stop your constant bigorty .
The Cro-Magnons Have No Descendants in Europe Today
posted