...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Deshret » Precolonial African Politics and Government » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Njii
Member # 21985
 - posted
 -

University of Sankore Between 1905 and 1906


Precolonial Africa had many different forms of politics and government and such a variety of politics and government was closely related to the level of economic organization and production. Village-style government with a council of elders and/or village chiefs predominated in hunting and gathering and small agricultural societies. Centralized governments with monarchical or oligarchic politics capable of collecting taxes, regulating commerce, and mobilizing armies were common in intensive-agriculture societies with a crafts-manufacturing sector. Egypt, Nubia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, and Songhay were examples of kingdoms and empires with centralized governments. Some empires and kingdoms were noted for their large towns or small- to medium-size cities. Many of these cities were trade and government centers, but some were renowned for education and culture. For example, the city of Timbuktu in present-day Mali not only sat on major trade routes, it was home to the University of Sankore, which was renowned as one of the high-intellectual centers of the medieval Muslim world. But regardless of level of economic organization and production, much political power in most societies rested in family or kinship groups. In addition, political or social identities had more to do with membership in family or kinship groups or in one’s language group than in being a resident in a given jurisdiction.



Slaves were present in numerous precolonial African societies. (Debates still rage as to whether Africans practiced slavery or some other form of unfree labor. Much depends on how people define slavery.) With the major exception of Pharonic Egypt, slaves never occupied central place in the political, economic, and social life of precolonial African societies. In other words, precolonial societies did not depend on enslaved labor like the United States once depended on enslaved labor. African slavery did not produce goods for the world market. African slaves augmented the labor power of their masters’ kinship or lineage groups. Enslaved women were more important than enslaved men because women were the primary farmers in agricultural societies and because enslaved women’s reproductive labor added new members to their masters’ kinship or lineage groups. In a number of precolonial societies, enslaved parents’ children were born free. Before and during the Atlantic slave trade, the vast majority of Africans became enslaved mainly through warfare as prisoners of war or as conquered people. Some became slaves through not paying their debts, being kidnapped, or committing a crime. But one must remember that Africans were not selling Africans into slavery. Since Africans did not see themselves as Africans before the late nineteenth century, one would be historically accurate to designate African enslavers from African slaves by mentioning their ethnic or linguistic identities. For example, the Ashante enslavers sold enslaved Yorubans to European enslavers for slave labor in the Americas. Amhara enslavers in Ethiopia sold enslaved Nuers to Muslim Africans or to Muslim Arabs for slave labor in northern Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere in Asia and under Turkish rule in southeastern Europe.

The point herein is that most enslaved Africans came from highly complex organized, agriculturally advanced societies; they were not from low-technology hunter-gather societies.
 
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Njii:
The point herein is that most enslaved Africans came from highly complex organized, agriculturally advanced societies; they were not from low-technology hunter-gather societies.

Of course they knew who they took. It also explains why the enslaved were forbidden to read and write.


quote:
The legend of slaves building Capitol is correct



http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jan/19/nancy-pelosi/legend-slaves-building-capitol-correct/


quote:
Slaves helped build White House, U.S. Capitol

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/12/02/slaves.white.house/index.html?_s=PM:US


quote:
Did slaves build the White House?
https://www.whitehousehistory.org/questions/did-slaves-build-the-white-house
 
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Njii:
The point herein is that most enslaved Africans came from highly complex organized, agriculturally advanced societies; they were not from low-technology hunter-gather societies


Enslaved women were more important than enslaved men because women were the primary farmers in agricultural societies and because enslaved women’s reproductive labor added new members to their masters’ kinship or lineage groups. In a number of precolonial societies, enslaved parents’ children were born free..

--Penn State University

http://elearning.la.psu.edu/afam/100/lesson-2-part1/african-roots-of-african-american-life-under-slavery/pre-colonial-african-politics-and-government
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3