...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Genetics Research Supports White supremacy
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [IMG]http://kimwillis.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/the-big-lie.jpg[/IMG] Everyday researchers publish new papers profiling European pre-history using shattered pieces of bones and teeth found in terrible condition. Yet no matter the condition, geneticists are able to recover genomic evidence that usually corresponds to Europeans that presently live in the area today and Native Americans. Yet archaeologists have discovered thousands of bones and teeth in Africa in pristine condition dating to every period. Yet geneticists claim they can not recover any genomic evidence except for some 4kya bones that suggest Eurasian admixture. . [IMG]http://sa-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/specieslie40246_n.jpg[/IMG] . Other researchers are attempting to suggest that there was widespread mixture between Africans and Europeans during colonial times. This is pure hog-wash. Except for South Africa there was very little admixture in Africa between Europeans and Africans. The Big Lie is that researchers expect everyone to believe they can recover genomic material from fragmentary corrupted bones and teeth--but can't recover genomic evidence from pristine bones and teeth from Africa. Modern Europeans do not appear in Europe until after 1400 BC., with spread of the Sea People. Before this they were in Central Asia and Mesopotamia. Yet, people on this site debate the identity of the : Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) West European Hunter-Gatherer (WHG) Caucasus hunter-gatherers (CHG) Early Farmers (EF) The Craniometrics make it clear that all these people were Negroes or Africans.The archaeological evidence indicates that the flora and fauna, especially from the Levant was Sub-Saharan African in origin, while the tools and pottery used by the ANE, WHG,CHG and EF people point back to Africa as well. . [IMG]https://pics.onsizzle.com/how-white-supremacists-lie-about-genetics-they-change-the-name-14910811.png[/IMG] . Although this is the case people have debates here on ES numbering 5-20 pages on how these people were not Africans, because the geneticists claim they are carrying Eurasian genes. Confidently, the Coconut on this site argue for the non-Africa character of the Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) West European Hunter-Gatherer (WHG) Caucasus hunter-gatherers (CHG) Early Farmers (EF) as they parrot the writings of any European geneticist claiming the ancient Black Europeans were Indo-Europeans carrying non-African genes. The ancient Eurasians are carrying the same genes Africans carry today, so there were no new mutations after the OOA.For example, in 2010, R-V88 was originally named R1b1a and it was renamed R1b1a2 . The samples from Samara identified as V88, are labled Rlbla--not R1b1a2. This shows that although researchers change the names of African haplogroups to cause confusion the truth is out there. Don't you get it. If the people are craniometrically Negroes/Africans, the flora and fauna is SSA and tools and pottery African in origin the people were also African--not Indo-European. It is time people stop spreading the Eurocentric LIE that the genes of the Paleolithic Europeans originated in Eurasia, instead of Africa. Just because posters here parrot what they have read, does not mean the research findings are wrong--it is the interpretation of the data which creates the Big Lie. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3