...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
White Europeans speak about black Europeans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Europeans(Davidski and his crew), in denial again that modern Europeans are depigmented Africans. Lol! They just can’t believe it…..lol! From the Davidski webiste ----- Modern-day Europeans: a post-Neolithic product There's a new preprint at bioRxiv looking at the relationship between ancient and modern-day Europeans. I think it misses its mark, because the [b]author concludes that the Neolithic transition created the modern-day European gene pool.[/b] This is only partly true, because modern-day Europeans are in fact, by and large, the product of intense Indo-European expansions from the [b]Late Neolithic to the Migration period.[/b] Just take a look the [b]Y-haplogroup landscape in much of Europe[/b] and you'll see that our direct ancestors did not mostly spring from Neolithic farming communities. If you want to find them in the ancient DNA record, then seek out post-Neolithic populations rich in R1b-L51, R1a-Z645 and I1-M253. By the way, the author uses Mormons from Utah (also known as CEU) to represent Europeans. I don't know if this is a problem, it might well be, but in any case, why Utah Mormons? Why not a wide variety of actual Europeans all the way from the Atlantic to the Urals? They're freely available online nowadays. Abstract: Genetic material sequenced from ancient samples is revolutionizing our understanding of the recent evolutionary past. However, ancient DNA is often degraded, resulting in low coverage, error-prone sequencing. Several solutions exist to this problem, ranging from simple approach such as selecting a read at random for each site to more complicated approaches involving genotype likelihoods. In this work, we present a novel method for assessing the relationship of an ancient sample with a modern population while accounting for sequencing error by analyzing raw read from multiple ancient individuals simultaneously. We show that when analyzing SNP data, it is better to sequencing more ancient samples to low coverage: two samples sequenced to 0.5x coverage provide better resolution than a single sample sequenced to 2x coverage. We also examined the power to detect whether an ancient sample is directly ancestral to a modern population, finding that with even a few high coverage individuals, even ancient samples that are very slightly diverged from the modern population can be detected with ease. When we applied our approach to European samples, we found that no ancient samples represent direct ancestors of modern Europeans. We also found that, as shown previously, the most ancient Europeans appear to have had the smallest effective population sizes, indicating a role for agriculture in modern population growth. Joshua Schraiber, Assessing the relationship of ancient and modern populations, bioRxiv, Posted March 4, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/113779 --- One thing I have to agree with Davidski is the male line appeared or at least started dominating Europe AFTER the Neolithic. The female line is most definitely African pre/Neolithic. Sergi, Coon and recent autosomal data points to the Neolithic’s being Africans through Craniology. Now that leaves the question of where the male line came from. It has also to be African. Why? The males are ALSO Autosomaly AFRICAN. If the autosomes are African then the nR-Y-DNA is also African. THEY GO TOGETHER…unfortunately. Lol! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3