...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Charlottesville: Race and Terror VIDEO
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [qb] Doug says [b]As far as Asians go, we need to stop lumping them in with our struggle. Asians are benefiting from all the fighting and dying that black folks did in the 50s and 60s when Asians couldn't come here. So most Asians who are in America today have never faced any racism.[/b] A bit misleading. Though not to the same extent as blacks, Asians have been around in the US quite a while and faced discrimination, the Chinese for example who were often massacred and driven out in te 1880s- so that the saying arose: [i]"Not a Chinaman's chance".. [/i] Then there is the case of the Japanese internees.. plenty of racism there. YOur point seems to apply more to RECENT Asian arrivals.. You fail to account for hundreds of thousands already IN PLACE before that who also kept on increasing via natural population growth. [IMG]https://images.ucpress.edu/covers/isbn13/9780520256941.jpg[/IMG] [b]And more importantly these people aren't here to fight racism and especially not to fight racism against black folks. They are being allowed into the country to be a buffer against blacks and to be used as a brain drain to help America and the West continue to dominate Asia economically and socially. [/b] Agan somewhat misleading. Asian immigration is not to help the West dominate Asia economically and socially. How so? Give a concrete example of your claim. If anything, that immigration is more helpful to Asians, as they get the opportunity to tap into Western networks of advanced technoogy and knowledge that they then can take to Asia and expand. Nothing wrong with this. The Japanese did this extensively to modernize and hold their own against white competitors, in turn becoming strong hegemons themselves in East Asia. By 1905 they were defeating European powers on the high seas naval battles. By 1941 they had the best integrated carrier systems, the best pilots, and in those initial years, the best carrier fighter plane, the famous Mitsubishi Zero. The Chinese are now doing the exact same thing- getting as much advanced knowledge as possible from the West, and growing stronger as a result. They of course supplied the West with several key items of technology that enabled Western dominance namely gunpowder, printing and the compass, back in the day. And is brain drain necessarily "bad"? CHina has no shortage of people training to be engineers, scientists etc, nor does India necessarily. In fact the Asians are using their internal education as an "export". Juat as some nations export copper or rice, so their educational systems churn out graduates for "export" to the West. Damn smart strategy. https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2015/01/30/the-surprising-secret-of-indias-success-could-be-its-brain-drain/ [IMG]http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-GS339_ibrain_G_20150130050838.jpg[/IMG] [b]So even though it is blacks that fought, struggled and sacrificed for America to change and make it possible to come here, the first thing they do is to spit in black folks faces and kick them in the face as a sign of appreciation [/b] This indeed may the the case with SOME. As Richard Pryor once said in one of his routines, the first thing some fireigners learn when they come to America is how to say "NIG&#%&r" 30 years later, some black folk are running around talkin bout how if you add an "a" to the ending, rather than an "r" - its not all bad.. [/qb][/QUOTE]I am talking about basic sociology and history. You need to read the writings of the Europeans over the last century and a half when they openly spoke on how they really felt about races and racism. In their minds their purpose is to mold the world into a form that is good for white supremacy, which means a racial pyramid where whites are on the top and other racial combination and groups are at some level below that with blacks on the very bottom. Of course this is not a natural historical fact of nature, so the only way to bring that about is open warfare, genocide, destruction, warfare, legalized racism, economic dislocation, mass migration and eugenics. America is not a "natural" occurrence because all the people here are immigrants from somewhere else, following the "hopes and dreams" held up by the white settlers and colonists who committed genocide and oppression to create the American nation. No different than the Spanish and Portuguese in Central and South America or the British and French in Canada. There is no such thing as "good" genocide. But the hypocritical lying racists will sit up here and tell you with a straight face that genocide is a normal part of history and part of the "greater good" of mankind, of course ONLY when white people are the ones doing the genocide. If tables were turned and white people were the ones being killed as part of the genocide, oh then it is bad and evil and everybody must fight to end such genocide. But not so much when white folks are the ones committing the crimes... This is a standard talking point and philosophical cornerstone of racism going back 500 years. As whites can "do no wrong" as part of their "global crusade" sanctioned by the Christian church (which has always been engaging in sexual misconduct). And it only works when they have complete domination in all spheres of human activity. If other people and other cultures had superior "homegrown" technology and culture to challenge whites then it would be a whole different ball game. So as it stands, the people migrating to America or any other European colony are simply acknowledging, buying into and pledging allegiance to the ideal of white supremacy as the epitome of progress in human life and thereby supporting the agenda and spread of white supremacy and its domination around the globe. Otherwise they would stay in their own countries and build their own cultures to be on par with if not superior to white colonial global exploitation. Mass migration and manipulation of populations based on economic, political and social tools has always been part of the "toolkit" of white supremacy. This is basically the standard strategy of divide and conquer which is based on the idea of identifying and creating a group of "haves" vs a group of "have nots" using control of economic resources, technology and migration laws to control social development. This is what you see in books written by folks like Aldus Huxley (Brave New World) or George Orwell (1984) and all of these are based on actual scientific movements like Eugenics and other racial doctrines coming from European scientists in the 1800s. For example: Francis Galton [QUOTE] Africa For The Chinese. To The Editor of The Times. Sir, - In a few days Sir Bartle Frere will return to England, and public attention will be directed to the East Coast of Africa. I am desirous of availing myself of the opportunity to ventilate some speculations of my own, which you may, perhaps, consider of sufficient interest to deserve publication in the Times. My proposal is to make the encouragement of the Chinese settlements at one or more suitable places on the East Coast of Africa a par of our national policy, in the belief that the Chinese immigrants would not only maintain their position, but that they would multiply and their descendants supplant the inferior Negro race. I should expect the large part of the African seaboard, now sparsely occupied by lazy, palavering savages living under the nominal sovereignty of the Zanzibar, or Portugal, might in a few years be tenanted by industrious, order loving Chinese, living either as a semi-detached dependency of China, or else in perfect freedom under their own law. In the latter case their would be similar to that of the inhabitants of Liberia, in West Africa, the territory which was purchased 50 years ago and set apart as an independent State for the reception of freed negroes from America. The opinion of the public on the real worth of the Negro race has halted between the extreme views which have been long and loudly proclaimed. It refuses to follow those of the early abolitionists, that all the barbarities in Africa are to be traced to the effects of a foreign slave trade, because travelers continually speak of similar barbarities existing in regions to which the slave trade has not penetrated. Captain Colomb has written a well-argued chapter on this matter, in his recent volume. On the other hand, the opinion of the present day repudiates the belief that the negro is an extremely inferior being, because there are notorious instances of negroes possessing high intelligence and culture, some of whom acquire large fortunes in commerce, and others become considerable men in other walks of life. The truth appears to be that individuals of the mental caliber I have just described are much more exceptional in the negro than in the Anglo-Saxon race, and that average negroes possess too little intellect, self-reliance, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support. The Chinaman is a being of another kind, who is endowed with a remarkable aptitude for a high material civilization. He is seen to the least advantage in his own country, where a temporary dark age still prevails, which has not sapped the genius of the race, though it has stunted the developed the of each member of it, by the rigid enforcement of an effete system of classical education which treats originality as a social crime. All the bad parts of his character, as his lying and servility, spring from timidity due to an education that has cowed him, and no treatment is better calculated to remedy that evil than location in a free settlement. The natural capacity of the Chinaman shows itself by the success with which, notwithstanding his timidity, he competes with strangers, wherever he may reside. The Chinese emigrants possess an extraordinary instinct for political and social organization; they contrive to establish for themselves a police and internal government, and they give no trouble to their rulers so long as they are left to manage those matters by themselves. They are good-tempered, frugal, industrious, saving, commercially inclined, and extraordinarily prolific. They thrive in all countries, the natives of the Southern provinces being perfectly able to labor and multiply in the hottest climates. Of all known varieties or mankind there is none so appropriate as the Chinaman to become the future occupant of the enormous regions which lie between the tropics, whose extent is far more vast than it appears, from the cramped manner in which those latitudes are pictured in the ordinary maps of the world. But take a globe and examine it, and consider the huge but poorly-peopled bulk of Africa, by whose side the areas of India and of China look insignificant, and think what a field lies there for the development of a suitable race. The Hindoo cannot fulfil the required conditions nearly as well as the Chinaman, for he is inferior to him in strength, industry, aptitude for saving, business habits, and prolific power. The Arab is little more than an eater up of other men's produce; he is a destroyer rather than a creator, and he is unprolific.[/QUOTE] http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm So human nature being what it is, Chinese and Asians coming to America are no more inclined to get involved in the African struggle for their rights or reparations in America than an African is to get involved in the struggle for Tibetan indpendence from China. It is not seen as "their fight". Most of the Asians you see in America like the Indians, Cambodians, Vietnamese and others have absolutely NOTHING to do with the Chinese that came here in the 1800s and were oppressed. Likewise, most Chinese in America are very young Children or recent migrants who came here since the 1960s after the Immigration Act of 1965. In fact most Chinese young folks coming here are very rich and children of the nuveu rich Communist capitalists who came about in China since the 1970s. China's rise to a global power is a result of Western know how and support since the 1970s. This isn't something that was part of Communist China before that. In fact, Communism in China was a failure as can be seen in the fact that before the 1970s China was an economic backwater and many people were poor peasants. So Nixon and Kissinger opened the door for a new class of Capitalists to rise after Mao's death and they haven't looked back since. They are fully and totally integrated with the Western capitalist monetary and banking system which is the goal and plan since the age of "gunboat diplomacy" and the opium wars. And lets not forget how Indians and Chinese treat Africans in India and China. [QUOTE] Chinese millionaires are warming up to Canada and cooling on Britain. But they're still red-hot for the United States. That's according to a survey by research firm Hurun Report and Visas Consulting Group that tracks immigration trends among Chinese individuals worth between 10 million and 200 million yuan ($1.5 million - $30 million). The U.S. retained its title as the top destination for rich Chinese emigrants for a third consecutive year. Meanwhile, Canada surpassed the U.K. for the first time to become the second-most popular choice. [/QUOTE] http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/17/investing/chinese-rich-immigration-hurun-report/index.html [QUOTE] Beijing (CNN)Jessica Zhang, a 21-year-old Chinese student from Jiangsu Province, says her English wasn't strong enough to fill in her U.S. college admission form. So her parents paid three consultants $4,500 to fill out the application, write her personal essay and compose teacher recommendation letters. They also arranged her visa and communicated with her prospective colleges -- eight ranked between 40 and 100 on the U.S. News & World Report College rankings. "It would have been too much hassle if I had applied myself," says Zhang, which is not her real name. In August, she'll start her undergraduate career with an open major at a Midwestern university, in the United States. She says she's unaware that her application could be considered fraudulent and even get her expelled. [/QUOTE] http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/12/asia/china-education-agencies/index.html Not only that, American cities are planning on keeping these foreign students as the basis for the new "future cities" that they are planning in America for 2030 and beyond. Meaning these people will be brought in as upper class wealthy replacements for black folks who will continue to be on the bottom tier of society, uneducated, with no power or money as a 3rd class minority behind everybody else. [QUOTE] Over 3 million new migrants arrive in towns and cities around the world every week. Right now, the urban population represents roughly 3.9 billion people and is expected to grow to 6.4 billion by 2050. The rapid growth of urban areas is nothing new, but the kind of cities that draw the most migrants is changing. According to the World Migration Report 2015, almost one in five migrants live in a "gateway city" such as London, Sydney or New York, where migrants make up a third of the local population. The future of migration, however, will be mostly felt in emerging economies including South Africa, Brazil and India, and within East Asia. [/QUOTE] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/02/who-has-the-largest-migrant-population/ [QUOTE] The United States is seeing increasing numbers of international students. According to the International Students Report, 819,644 international studied in U.S. colleges and universities in 2013. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s Homeland Securities Investigations projects that number will likely increase significantly for the 2014 school year. Still, some international students are turning to other countries because of their easier immigration policies that allow students to remain in the country once they graduate. But what’s the problem with having these students leave once they graduate? Plenty. International students have enrolled at American institutions and this is good for the bottom line of these schools. Administrators at these institutions say such students promote the diversity and global perspectives on campus, but these students provide more. The economic downturn of the past five years has forced a decline in state spending at the universities. The numbers reveal a 28 percent reduction on higher education spending and out-of-state and international students have kept these schools in the black. Francesco Sanchez, the undersecretary for international trade at the Commerce Department, has said that the U.S. has “no better export.” Former Secretary of Treasury, and former Harvard president Larry Summers, acknowledges that “exporting higher education” is a vital part of his own recommendations for encouraging economic growth. While some international students gain financial assistance from U.S. universities, it is nowhere near the amount that is available to American students. More often than not the international students who study here pay full fare, or their governments pay a high percentage of their tuition costs, and that makes them highly desirable to schools. Of particular interest, a full 35 percent of the advanced degrees these students seek is in STEM fields: science, technology, engineering, and math. Students pursuing degrees in STEM is good for the future of American business if — emphasis added, they are allowed to remain in the U.S. once graduating. When these international students graduate we lose highly trained and valuable human capital. When they are sent packing to their home countries, they take potential businesses and the possibility of hiring Americans for those job openings with them. [/QUOTE] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lauren-harris/education-and-immigration_b_5609706.html [QUOTE] If you have access to $500,000, it is possible to buy your way into America. No need to stand in line; no need to wait years. Hand over the money and take your papers. In 1990, Congress created the EB-5 visa program to promote economic vibrancy through job creation. It became possible for rich immigrants to obtain a green card by investing $1 million in a business with the condition that at least 10 jobs would be created through the investment; or $500,000 in a business project in a rural area — one that has had a severe shortfall in jobs, with an unemployment rate of at least 150 percent of the national average; or $500,000 as part of a regional center — a firm that sponsors projects for EB-5 investments. There are 838 approved regional centers in America, and 203 of those are in California. In San Francisco, Golden Gate Global is an EB-5 Regional Center. GGG is behind the Hunters Point Shipyard project, which has floated seven EB-5 funds for infrastructure installations and home construction. This 775-acre project is pitched as being San Francisco’s “largest-ever development” on the waterfront with a projected 12,000 housing units and expansive commercial, retail and recreational spaces. Despite opposition, Congress approved the EB-5 program on Dec. 15, 2015. The program will continue as before until Sept. 30, 2016. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) are outspoken critics of the program. Grassley called it a program with “serious problems and serious vulnerabilities.” The vulnerabilities he lists include no background checks on anyone associated with a regional center; investment levels not adjusted in 25 years; regional centers not required to comply with securities laws; and regional center operators possibly fleecing foreign nationals above and beyond the investment requirements with little oversight. There have been several cases of investors defrauded. The SEC filed a $68 million federal fraud complaint last year against Luca International and its CEO in U.S. District Court in San Francisco for “running a Ponzi-like scheme” and drawing Chinese immigrants into EB-5 investments. And then there’s the curious case of China supplying 83.5 percent of EB-5 investors in 2015. That looks like a red flag. Why is there not a more equitable distribution of countries providing investors? [/QUOTE] http://www.sfexaminer.com/green-cards-wealthy/ A perfect example of how this gentrification will play out with a new 'global community' that will displace local black folks can be seen in Hunter's Point a neighborhood in San Francisco. Black people have always been a minority in San Francisco and most of them were forced to live in neighborhoods like Filmore and Hunters Point. Now they are redeveloping Hunters Point as a high end community and of course black folks will no longer be part of this community. [QUOTE] One of the most famous and luxurious cities in the world, the San Francisco ghetto often gets ignored or paid little attention to, especially with today’s gentrification of the once thriving black communities. While the San Francisco black population is only 6% of over 800,000 people, with whites and Asians making up the majority and a total of 15% of the Mexican population, there are a few communities in the city. The San Francisco ghetto and community are in areas like the Sunnydale Projects, the Mission District, Lakeview or the View, the infamous Hunters Point’s blocks and projects, project buildings on the streets of Connecticut, Missouri, and Dakota in Potrero Hill and the legendary Fillmore neighborhood, which is the most known and famous neighborhood of the San Francisco black population.[/QUOTE] http://www.therealstreetz.com/2016/02/29/story-san-francisco-ghetto/ Same thing in Harlem and South Philadelphia, Atlanta, Dallas, Pittsburgh and so forth. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3