...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
V88 and the Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] I see what your method is Clyde. They call that circular logic. [/qb][/QUOTE]No the method is called archaeogenetics. I use archaeology and genetics to determine population genetics. The North African Neolithic and Abusir mummies aDNA, proves that Africans carried this mtDNA, and Tutankhamun R1b Y-Chromosome makes it clear all the so-called Eurasian haplogroups are in reality African clades. This confirmed by the fact that: 1) The civilizations in Iberia originated in Africa; 2) The inhabitants of the North African Neolithic, Sudan and Levant/Anatolia were Kushites 3) The textual, historical and archaeological evidence make it clear that the people in these areas were Kushites. [/qb][/QUOTE]You don't know what circular logic is. Look into it. The North African Neolithic and Abusir mummies aDNA, proves that Africans carried this mtDNA, and Tutankhamun R1b Y-Chromosome makes it clear all the so-called Eurasian haplogroups are in reality African clades. ^ this has no logic to it. (not to mention there is no scientific publication that says Tutankhamun was an R1b carrier. The fact is if a mummy carries a certain haplogroup and the mummy was found in Africa that does not mean the haplogroup is instantly African. Clyde that is a very simplistic assumption. Just because a mummy found in Africa carries a given haplogroup does not mean that they got it in Africa It might be an indigenous haplogroup or it may not have been. It may or may not be due to admixture with foreigners and it is documented that some Egyptians had foreign wives And all 3 of your points in regard to Tutankhamun and the Abusir mummies do not resolve this. You have no methodology Furthermore you keep using the term Kushites and they are of a time period much later than neolithic. You should be using a term with proper association of the time period. Nobody uses "Kushites" they way you do, [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3