...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
V88 and the Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The evidence is King Tut's genetics test results. [/QUOTE]they are not published , so stop the nonsense iGENEA had no access to the mummy or data [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Tutankhamun R1b Y-Chromosome makes it clear [/QUOTE]when Tutankhamen's DNA is published and it's Hapolgroup E you will live to regret this claim [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: If a theory can not be falsified through the variables (evidenc) associated with the theory it is confirmed. [/QUOTE]^ That is a logical fallacy called Argument from ignorance [/qb][/QUOTE][QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The phrase "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence", does not apply in this case. [/QUOTE]There are two types of Argument from ignorance Again [b]Argument from ignorance also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a) a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or b)a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. [/b] ^ those are both wrong "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" is a true statement which is a criticism of proposition b) which claimed a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. In other words lack of evidence for X is not evidence against X. However your method is an illustration of the first wrong proposition a) a) a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false that is very clearly what you have here > [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: If a theory can not be falsified through the variables (evidenc) associated with the theory it is confirmed. [/QUOTE]^ This is a type of Argument from ignorance The truthful criticism of it is> "the absence of evidence is not evidence of existence" iGENEA did not present evidence. They just said they claimed to have seen it on a computer monitor in a documentary but they presented no screen captures, no figures, no method. So you have no idea how to present a scientific theory. Somebody just announces something, says "trust me" and if you like the theory you accept it. That is your whole life [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3