...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
"Darwinists don't accept direction in evolution." -- Swenet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: But randomness by itself [b]does not tell you how the first cells formed[/b] and how chromosomes developed.[/QUOTE]Speak for yourself. You don't speak for others. That is indeed what they're saying--that the things you mention evolved by pure chance alone. You're trying to have your cake and eat it too. After pushing back against 'direction', you're now talking about "invention of DNA" to explain these cell structures. Someone could argue that "invention of DNA" necessarily means divine intervention, since there is nothing else to account for it. You're not making any sense talking about "unlocked genetic codes that aren't random" and "invention of DNA and RNA" when you've already committed to "natural processes" (as opposed to any sort of 'intervention'). You were very specific about what causes evolutionary change on the first couple of pages: [i]Cellular biology and division is shown to be [b]based on genetic mutation. Genetic mutations are based on environmental feedback. That is the basis of all evolutionary change in living organisms.[/b][/i] --Doug M Not that I expect you to make sense of your contradictions. You're never addressing inconsistencies people see in your views. You just steamroll over what they're saying by posting walls of text and repeating things that completely miss the point. But go ahead, try to make sense of these contradictions without doing more gymnastics. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3