...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
NEW PUNIC SAMPLES FROM TUNISIA !!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: How are you so capable of responding to something without actually responding to it. It seems as if you absolutely have no Idea what I'm talking about. Just responding to respond. talking to talk. It doesn't matter if they were guanches or modern Canarians, you used both examples in different analysis to infer that the one "pure" sample was the same as modern North Africans. [b]Are Tunisians best modeled as 75% IAM??[/b] Which modern PURE Maghrebi by your standards(lacks Slave admixture) is 25% Mota-related? Your argument is once again like saying Taforalt is a Horner because they "cluster" with Horners in PCA... It's stupid. also QPWave tests for possible ancestral populations... Not relatedness. It's not semantics its comprehension. Both Canary Islanders and this sample have had similar contributions from admixing populations. IAM-related + Neolithic Farmer related. Other additive in the other Punic individuals pulled them into another "cluster." (qpwave doesn't work with "clusters" for your info) And you can just go ahead and ignore the mtDNA thing. If you believe there's only one pure N.African then the results should make sense to you. Other than that, I don't think you even comprehended why I was concerned about the lack of attention given to the MTDNA haplogroup distribution in the study. [/QB][/QUOTE]Don't pretend these models are the best way to model them, they are obviously flawed people already complained many times about the used of Morocco_LN and they also lacked proper natufian and subsaharan proxies (they literally brought mota lmao) lol When we'll get his G25 coordinates you'll see how much lower IAM he'll get ....I mean how do you explain that someone that is supposed to be 70% IAM ends up clustering with modern mozabites and moroccans XD like I told you he probably had more IAM and less EEF than these four euro shifted samples. What's your point with QPWave ? Where did you see that it pulled them into another cluster ? As for the MtDNA I already told you that you shouldn't be so quick to draw conclusions for obvious reasons. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3