...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Kemet
»
Beware of the New Surge of 'Information War'
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Narmerthoth: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Narmerthoth: [qb] Where is the new news here? Looks like the same ole repackaged and distributed pseudoscience to me. [/qb][/QUOTE]It indeed is. So what we have thus far: A racist man named Felix von Luschan who used terror and collected human remains from indigenous people. This is called the Felix von Luschan Skull Collection. And we have a institution with an extremely horrendous Nazi history. An institute which managed to maskout given data, either by modern day populations (called ghost populations) or supposed Neanderthal-DNA, which was not found in Africans but anybody else, which later was debunked by other scientists in the field. So, what are we dealing with here? [QUOTE]Max Planck Society admits to its predecessor's Nazi links Alison Abbott Hubert Markl, president of the Max Planck Society (MPS), has accepted that the management and staff of its predecessor society were involved in Nazi war atrocities, and has apologized to their victims.His statement was in response to the findings of a group of science historians he commissioned in 1999 to investigate the role played by basic researchers of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society during the Second World War. [/QUOTE] https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v411/n6839/full/411726b0.html [/qb][/QUOTE]Not surprising, most all of these European and US institutions have similar histories. However, besides that, I am speaking of the glaring disconnects between the genetics medical communities and historic population geneics communities, and how they each reference and classify these various defects. As we see here and in xyzman's recent thread, they are being described as if they are the result of natural selection, and all of the OCA stages are being presented as "normal" genes. But when you review the primary Gnome research objective, Medical, they are described thusly; [i]An anomaly occurring at this stage is responsible for oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) types 1–4. [b]OCAs are now considered to be diseases[/b] affecting the intracellular transport of tyrosinase rather than impaired catalytic functions of melanogenesis enzymes. Indeed, even minor mutations of TYR or TYRP1 induce the same clinical phenotype as mutations responsible for the loss of protein function. All muteins are indeed recognized as abnormal by the quality control system of the endoplasmic reticulum, and are then directed to the proteasome to be degraded [14, 15][/i] The above descriptions are consistent in genetic medical research, and OCA is ALWAYS described as an undesirable autosomal disease. That being true, you can deduce what the primary objective of Human Gnome medical research is; Cure/Reversal Genetics Research. So, the difference is clear and there is no doubt the objectives of Human Gnome medical research, which presents data more honestly, is quite different then the objectives and how the same data is being used for Anthropology, which is far less honest in it's descriptions and true objectives. * Atlas of Pigmentary Disorders Thierry Passeron · Jean-Paul Ortonne Switzerland 2016 [IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/44y6uzk43/Melanogenesis.png[/IMG] [IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/b9g040rdf/UV-_Stimulation-_Keratinocyte.png[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3