...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Kemet
»
Beware of the New Surge of 'Information War'
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: Based on the fact that Abusir was a Hyksos settlement [/QUOTE]Abusir was not a Hyksos settlement [/qb][/QUOTE]Abusir was a Hyksos site. Even posters on Forumbiodiversity admit to this fact. [/qb][/QUOTE][QUOTE] [i]Especially from the second millennium BCE onwards, there were intense, historically- and archaeologically documented contacts, including the large-scale immigration of Canaanite populations, known as the Hyksos, into Lower Egypt, whose origins lie in the Middle Bronze Age Levant[/i]. [b]54[/b][/QUOTE]--Verena J. Schuenemann et al. Side note 54: Mumford, G. D. Egypt and the Levant, The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000-332 BCE Oxford (2014). https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-archaeology-of-the-levant-9780199212972?cc=nl&lang=en& [/qb][/QUOTE]It's a general statement . It doesn't say that Abusir el-Meleq was a Hyksos settlement. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: These mummies fall within the range of the same late dynasty. The oldest specimen in the Abusir samples goes back to 769 B.C. [/QUOTE]The Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt was the first Hyksos dynasty ( 1650 to 1550 BC) a period of about 100 years Amarna is 18th Dynsaty including the Amenhoteps, Thutmoses, Hatshepsut, Akhenaten, Tutankhamun and others The Amarna Kings were stricken from the Kings list The 19th and 20th included the Ramesses and Setis and others The date 769 BC, around the mummies analyzed is far later than the Hyksos is around the Libyan period and prior to the Nubian but the Libyans were ruling up north in the Delta not where Abusir el-Meleq is which was an important religious and trading centre. "The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the 1,300 year timespan we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule," says Wolfgang Haak, group leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena. [/qb][/QUOTE]How many times must you be told that Asiatics from the Levant infiltrated into Northern Egypt on a *large-scale* around 1800 bc? Levantine populations imposed themselves demographically and followed that with political domination around 700 bc. Why would there be any subsequent major shifts? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3