...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Kemet
»
Beware of the New Surge of 'Information War'
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Andromeda2025: If you go back and read the old Afrocentricist like John Henrik Clarke et al. You will never find them claiming the Delta as Black African. Neither did Massey for that matter. With a careful reading you will find they claim Egypt/ Kemet was an inner African creation and culture. In fact the latest genetics studies prove this point sufficiently for me. What is the material culture from these Near Easterners? What is their culture and language? The North African's that Menes conquered where like hillbillies, I will call them Swampbillies. [/QUOTE][IMG]http://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/foreignrelations/palestinepotteryinegypt.gif[/IMG] Here is the location of the mummies that were analyzed, Abusir el-Meleq, near Fayum [QUOTE] Our genetic time transect suggests genetic continuity between the Pre-Ptolemaic, Ptolemaic and Roman populations of Abusir el-Meleq, indicating that foreign rule impacted the town’s population only to a very limited degree at the genetic level. It is possible that the genetic impact of Greek and Roman immigration was more pronounced in the north-western Delta and the Fayum, where most Greek and Roman settlement concentrated43,55, or among the higher classes of Egyptian society55. Under Ptolemaic and Roman rule, ethnic descent was crucial to belonging to an elite group and afforded a privileged position in society55. Especially in the Roman Period there may have been significant legal and social incentives to marry within one’s ethnic group, as individuals with Roman citizenship had to marry other Roman citizens to pass on their citizenship. Such policies are likely to have affected the intermarriage of Romans and non-Romans to a degree55. Additional genetic studies on ancient human remains from Egypt are needed with extensive geographical, social and chronological spread in order to expand our current picture in variety, accuracy and detail. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: These mummies fall within the range of the same late dynasty. The oldest specimen in the Abusir samples goes back to 769 B.C. [/QUOTE]Nearly right if you look at the 3 mummies for genome analysis Supplementary Table 1 JK2888 BC 97-2 Hap U6a2 JK2134 BC 776-569 Hap J1d JK 2911 BC 769-560 Hap M1a2a . . However 40 mummies are analyzed, a couple quite a bit older [QUOTE] In order to analyse the nuclear DNA we selected 40 samples with high mtDNA coverage and low mtDNA contamination. [/QUOTE]including JK2916 BC 1111-998 Hap R0 JK2885 BC 1304-1136 Hap R2'JT https://images.nature.com/original/nature-assets/ncomms/2017/170530/ncomms15694/extref/ncomms15694-s1.xlsx [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3