...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egypt and the Bible
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Wally: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by S.Mohammad: [b] My. my, my, you're not helping me out. First, there is no "Semitic" race and why should blacks be restricted to the line of Ham only? If you look at Ham's line not all of his descendants correspond to black races, only Cush does. Cush's son, Nimrod has his territories in Levantine/Eastern Mediterranean area. Moses didn't divide these into race, look again at the Table of Nations, most of those DO NOT rigidly correspond to modern races. Egyptians simply painted foreigners as they saw them as a general representation. They painted Libyans, some, as blond and white skinned, we know that all Libyans aren't that color. And Egyptians did paint themselves as lighter than Nubians, but not all Egyptians were lighter than Nubians. You still have not proven that Canaanites were black. Some of those dubbed as Asiatics and Semitic were of Syro-Palestinian origin(Canaanites, Phoenicians). These people were Semitic speakers, not Hamitic speakers. [This message has been edited by S.Mohammad (edited 05 June 2004).][/b][/QUOTE] As anyone who is following this, it is hopeless isn't it? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3