...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egypt and the Bible
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by supercar: [QB] Well said Homeylu. When we are relating the AE study to the Bible, the subject of this thread, I hope we are doing so by analyzing what the bible states, and how that really fits into the AE study. So I am not arguing what the Bible says, because I cannot make an argument on that. The Bible states whatever it states...I can't change that. So if you state that the Bible mentions something, then to me that is not an analysis. What I believe is being debated here, is how 'whatever is mentioned in the Bible in relation to AE' is analyzed. For instance if you say that according to the Bible 'Canaan' means 'black', therefore it means the Canaanite people were referring to themselves [as being black people], that is what is being debated. It is your analysis that is being debated, not the fact that Bible mentions 'Canaan' to mean black. Do you see what I mean by this! On the same token, when you state that the Bible mentions the exodus, and Moses as the leader, I am not debating that the Bible mentions that. I am simply analyzing what the Bible says, and trying to fit it with the AE study. In this instance, barring any new discoveries, I feel that the Bibles claim or theory doesn't fit well with AE study. I hope that's what this thread is about; taking what the Bible says, and trying to fit it with what is known about AE. Otherwise, the thread turns out to be nothing but preaching the Bible. [This message has been edited by supercar (edited 18 June 2004).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3