...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egypt's southern borders
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [b]altakuri, on Group A Nubia: Just a few questions: If so, how can we possibly justify the notion that Nehesi is not a part of the polity that is Km.t. (the ruling class is not a part of the Nation?) [This message has been edited by rasol (edited 17 December 2004).][/b][/QUOTE] This is how we do it. We examine the records left by the politicos of KM.t. When they set up the nomes TaNehesy was not included hence it was outside of the polity of TaWy. And what do you mean by your use of Nehesi without Ta? Are you switching back and forth from land to people as covenient for your argument instead of sticking to precision? Every Nehesi was not an A group member. Nor did every Nehesi have royal rights. That was limited to certain families. Probably the ones of Qustul nobility who themselves probably had to trace their family claims upriver to most sacred Djebel Barkal with its holy Ipet Sut. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3