...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Coon Exposed
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Kem-Au: [b]Maybe one of you guys can help me out. I'm not to big on the genetics things so forgive me if this is a stupid question. I watched a program on the biological Eve, and from what I understand, she was supposed to be the mother of all men outside of Africa. The point was that every non black human being is the result of a single migration out of Africa. Are they suggesting that everyone, including all Africans, can trace their lineage back to a single woman some 200,000 years ago? Forgive me if you've already been over this but I usually back away from a topic once the trolls get on it.[/b][/QUOTE] We need intelligent posters like you to help keep things on topic. The idea is that she is a common ancestor of all human beings - not the only ancestor. For example, you share two ancestors with your first cousin - two grandparents. But you also have two other grandparents that you do not share. What is also of interest is that all people outside of Africa [black, non black, is irrelevant to the genetics of it] are descendant from a small group of people living in East Africa at the time. We know that because the entire non-African maternal [female] DNA pool is derived from just L3 [on the map shown above]. The overwhelming majority of the human races genetic material is actually found in and among africans. All the rest of the world [regardless of physical appearance] contains only a fraction of the genetic diversity found in Africa. This is also why maps sometimes foisted on the unknowing with the intent of showing the great distance that exist between different parts of Africa or African peoples are misleading. Of course genetic distances in Africa can be contrived as 'great' because most of the genome is African to begin with. For example, this map was used be Erroneous E to try to prove a point about the Lemba: According to Erroneous E's BOTTOM LINE: [i]accompanying maps group Lemba with or near "Caucasoid" populations, away from "Negroids."[/i] [IMG]http://tinypic.com/1etpom[/IMG] Until he was made to confront the reality of what the Lemba actually look like: [IMG]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/israel/images/priest.jpeg[/IMG] ...at which point he was forced to reverse himself and claimed the Lemba were "negligibly" caucazoid. Whatever Euro-fool! Same with the San, above grouped with the Zulu and not the Lemba. You could just as easily circle the Lemba, Ethiopians and Zulu and exclude the San. Or acknolwedge the reality of African diversity by [b]circling them all.[/b] Carleton Coon's caucazoid propaganda anthropology is dead. His 'followers' are intellectual zombies...brain dead, but just can't admit it. [IMG]http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/rolleyes.gif[/IMG] [This message has been edited by rasol (edited 04 April 2005).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3