...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Coon Exposed
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Super car: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Evil Euro: Yes, Coon was wrong to call the Tutsi "Caucasoid", just as Hiernaux was wrong to call them "Hamitic". As I proved, they carry only E3a, not E3b, and accordingly show no clear evidence of Caucasoid admixture (unusual-looking Paul Kagame notwithstanding)[/QUOTE] [b]Actually, not surprisingly this is an outright LIE.[/b] This was a point that was proven to you, by others. And yes, at times even your own sources were used against you, because you misinterpret them; that is no cause for taking credit for the 'correction' of what ****you did in your best to distort***. You have been claiming that they exhibited their traits because they must have come from east Africa, and then got their negroid traits from Bantus that over-run them. That you constantly reshape your position is no doubt a clear sign of bankruptcy in your entire outlook of geneology. Geneology is best left in the hands of those who can understand them, and therefore correctly interpret them, even when they are outdated. You've done a good job of proving that you don't have what it takes to do such a thing. [IMG]http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/smile.gif[/IMG] [This message has been edited by Super car (edited 06 April 2005).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3