...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Kushites: “Nilo-Saharan” speakers vs. a “language isolate” speakers
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by basicbows: [QB] Mr Winters: The burden of proof does not lie with me to disconfirm your hypotheses; the burden is on you to prove them. Your evidence must contain more than just assertions; you have to elaborate on the methodology of your linguistic constructions; [b]and[/b] also show how mainstream linguists' methodologies are false. Once again, that takes more than mere assertion. (If I followed your logic, I'd challenge you to "disprove" my theory about "green mice".) Furthermore, you are [i]not[/i] trained as a professional linguist(it is, after all,a technical field); your field is Education. Had you actually deciphered the languages you claim to have deciphered, you'd have already won some great distinction, perhaps the Nobel Prize, and your name would be famous. I ask you to cite [b]one[/b] professional linguist who addresses your claims. Can you? What about my green mice theory? You can't cite one scientist who has ever disproved my theory.You know why? BTW, I don't want to quibble over the term "common sense", but I think it was Einstein who said that science is common sense carried to a higher level of abstraction. Ok, let's just deal with Tocharian, to keep this argument from ranging too far afield. Explain to me how the people who decided Tocharian was an IE language are wrong,and how your methodology necessarily differs from theirs, and will result in vastly different conclusions. So, Winters, you claim to be the genius. Well, start teaching me! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3