...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT - Natufian fossil find announced in 1932 NY Times article.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Quite correct Supercar. The science is almost subverted by the concern with keeping "Negro blood" out of the holy land. So in this case we have "negroid" skeletal remains with presumably non-negroid blood! [/QUOTE]In fact the terms are intrinsically nonsensical, and necessarily so, sense they were meant to support hypothesis which have been refuted. A refuted hypothesis can only be sustained thru evasive and parodoxical nonsense rhetoric. In any debate when the other party uses nonsense terms, and 'you' ACCEPT THE TERMS in order to argue over how best to apply them -> you have in fact lost the debate, because like a fool - you accepted the nonsense terms. Too many Africanists continue to waste time with such self defeating arguments. And this is why astute progressive African scientists like Keita, reject these terms and the falsified root premises upon which they are based. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3