...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT - Natufian fossil find announced in 1932 NY Times article.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Calypso: [qb] Quite correct Supercar. The science is almost subverted by the concern with keeping "Negro blood" out of the holy land. So in this case we have "negroid" skeletal remains with presumably non-negroid blood! It also higlights the absurdity of Horemheb's notion that conspiracy involves meeting in secret around a table to plan a particular agenda. Here we see the ingrained inclination (a sixth sense) on the part of these racists to not see "negroes" anywhere except in the Congo.[/qb][/QUOTE]Correct. What professor Hore and others fail to realize that it wasn't so much a "conspiracy" than a deeply rooted socio-physchology that many people back then including scientists and scholars had. For many Westerners at that time, blacks being an "inferior race" wasn't just a personal prejudice but a widespred notion accepted as scientific dogma as it was religious dogma. For many, such a notion was scientific truth in itself. Which is why it became inconcievable to attribute blacks to high or advanced culture as it was to acknowledge their presence in the Holy Land of all places, even though the Holy Land is right next door to Africa! The fact that Egypt is [i]in[/i] Africa itself is to no avail. A perfect example of one who suffers this mental syndrome this day and age would be the new troll that has just showed up! ;) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3