...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT - Human genes NY times article
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] This is all hog wash. First of all there are no skeletons of modern Chinese dating to 10,000 years. The earliest Mongoloid people in China and elsewhere were the Indonesian/Filipino type.The contempory Chinese are decendants of the Zhou who did not arrive in China until after 1700 BC. There are no contemporary European that are anologous to the Old Europeans (c.4000-3500 BC) let alone, related to Grimaldi and Cro-Magnon (another African type) skeletons dating to 10,000 BC. Moreover, as pointed out in a recent news story the ancient Europeans and contemporary Europeans have different genes and do not show continuity. The skeletal evidence for Asians and Europeans do not go back to 10000 BC, therefore the conclusions of this paper are unfounded. This paper is propaganda. Even if there were Indo-European speakers at 10,000 BC these people were nomadic and failed to practice agriculture at this early date. . [/qb][/QUOTE][b]LOL[/b] Sorry Clyde, but the only one spouting hogwash is YOU. Where is the evidence of Austronesians (Indonesian-Filipinos) in China [if that's what you mean]?! If Chinese are "recent" arrivals as you claim, then where did they originate?? You are aware that human remains have been found in China dating from the Mesolithic that look like Native Americans or such. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3