...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The African Foundation of Modern Spain (The Berbers)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by yazid904: [QB] Horemheb, When Tariq entered Spain in 711, Germanic tribes controlled that area. Although the original inhabitants were stated to be celti-iberos, it mean the Celts journeyed to Spain and merged with the Iberian people (possible from Carthage? who is sure) hence the term celti-iberos. The Celts have maintained their homeland in Northern Spain and Portugal and it seems that although they may have been part of the southern part, they were ultimately driven north (Galicia) by the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths. Carthage is Africa and 700 years of history is a foundation. Words, place names in Arabic (gibraltar=rock of tariq), guadalquivie=wadi al quiber?) have been localized in local language. The Alhambra is not a Celtic sronghold! It is Arabic culture itself though built on th remain o a Christian church but nonethless a tribute to a past glory! It is obvious Spain is a European country and it is apparent that the mozarabes who were native Spaniards (a loaded word here meaning born in Spain) who were such in skin hue only because they dressed, behaved, etc with Arabic (correctly Berber/Moor) customs. If 700 years of Roman influence is good enough for Africa and non European locations, why is 700 years of North African presence in Europe the exact opposite? Is 300 years of European hegemony in North America more important than 1000 years of Native American presence? It always depends on who writes history? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3