...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Blacks In Palestine - Revisted
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] Yom [QUOTE] If that were the case it would be pretty obvious. While there is some cushitic substratum in the modern languages (not really in Ge'ez, and none evident in the proto-Ge'ez used in D`mt), the languages are very obviously Semitic and not Cushitic with heavy Semitic loaning. [/QUOTE]Yom what do you mean Proto-Ge'ez used in Diamat. The people of Diamat could not have employed Proto-Ge'ez, because a proto-language is a language which is reconstructed by linguist and left no evidence of its former existence. As a result, if the people of Diamat wrote in Ge'ez, they wrote in Ge'ez and not proto-Ge'ez. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3