...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
O.T. Races Exist: Global variation in copy number in the human genome
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [qb] When the word race was used in the [i]GENETIC BREAKTHROUGH[/i] article, who was using it? The population geneticists or the journalist who wrote the article? I see population geneticists talking about geographic populations. I see a journalist dumbing it down writing about races. James Lupski uses "human genetics." Matthew Hurles uses "genetic differences." Stephen Scherer, Charles Lee, Mark Walport, Nigel Carter, none of them are quoted using the word race. Steve Connors, journalist, is the one who took the three regional identifiers, African, Asian, and European, and inferred the involvement of races rather than geographical populations. We need be careful when attributing words to a source. Does the source indeed use the word or concepts we ascribe to them? [/qb][/QUOTE]Anyone who isn't as dumb as Winters needs them to be would realise that in this entire thread - not a single sentense in support of race has been atributed to any biologist. Meanwhile Alan Templeton, Shomarka Keita, Spencer Wells, Rick Kittles and Nina Jablonsky have all been quoted directly and in opposition to race-typologies. Actual comments from these scholars go unaddressed by Winters, because he has no idea of how to respond. That's why he spams instead of addressing the citations or answering the questions. It adds up.... Another boring pointless fiasco of a thread by Winters. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3