...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » Population continuity or population change: Formation of the Ancient Egyptian state » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Mansa Musa
Member # 6800
 - posted
quote:
Population continuity or population change: Formation of the ancient Egyptian state


Abstract

The origins of the ancient Egyptian state and its formation have received much attention through analysis of mortuary contexts, skeletal material, and trade. Genetic diversity was analyzed by studying craniometric variation within a series of six time-successive Egyptian populations in order to investigate the evidence for migration over the period of the development of social hierarchy and the Egyptian state. Craniometric variation, based upon 16 measurements, was assessed through principal components analysis, discriminant function analysis, and Mahalanobis D2 matrix computation. Spatial and temporal relationships were assessed by Mantel and Partial Mantel tests. The results indicate overall population continuity over the Predynastic and early Dynastic, and high levels of genetic heterogeneity, thereby suggesting that state formation occurred as a mainly indigenous process. Nevertheless, significant differences were found in morphology between both geographically-pooled and cemetery-specific temporal groups, indicating that some migration occurred along the Egyptian Nile Valley over the periods studied. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

LINK

This study was published online this month according to Wiley InterScience.

The author is Dr. Sonia R. Zakrzewski. As many people here may recall Dr. Zakrzewski was the British bioanthropologist who confirmed that the Ancient Egyptians had tropical body plans.

Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time. [Cool]

I am very insterested in seeing this study. Do you have it by any chance Myra?
 
rasol
Member # 4592
 - posted
^ She is also one of the anthropologist who called to task Howells Ptolemiac Era E series remains as being 'non representative' or unlike ancient Egyptians.

This is and important citation to reference because the most widely reported attempts to associate km.t with Europeans are based on Howells E series....including some outdated work by Brace and others.
 
Myra Wysinger
Member # 10126
 - posted
Population Continuity or Population Change: Formation of the Ancient Egyptian State
Sonia R. Zakrzewski
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132: 501–509 (2007)

PDF file

.
 
Mansa Musa
Member # 6800
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Myra Wysinger:
Population Continuity or Population Change: Formation of the Ancient Egyptian State
Sonia R. Zakrzewski
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132: 501–509 (2007)

PDF file

.

Thank you, Myra. [Smile]
 
Myra Wysinger
Member # 10126
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mansa Musa:
Thank you, Myra. [Smile]

Your welcome [Wink]
 
Underpants Man
Member # 3735
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mansa Musa:
Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time. [Cool]

She doesn't seem to mention any analysis of post-dynastic skulls in this study. It appears to focus on the relationship between predynastic and early dynastic crania. The conclusion, that predynastic and early dynastic skulls were closely related, does refute any notions that some grand K-zoid race brought civilization to Egypt.
 
Mansa Musa
Member # 6800
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Underpants Man:
quote:
Originally posted by Mansa Musa:
Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time. [Cool]

She doesn't seem to mention any analysis of post-dynastic skulls in this study. It appears to focus on the relationship between predynastic and early dynastic crania. The conclusion, that predynastic and early dynastic skulls were closely related, does refute any notions that some grand K-zoid race brought civilization to Egypt.
Yeah I gathered that after reading it all. The study also only seems to be about craniometric variation and does not take into account other examples of biological evidence.

I'd really like to see a study that does that and analyzes Egypt in all major periods.

I'll be reading over this one a bit more. Does anyone else who has read the study have any insights?
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3