...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Anthropometric and genetic plots on Saharans and Sahelians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by X-Ras: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [qb] [QUOTE]mayne that atuosomal dendogram is full of contradictions, Somalis have little to no E3b*[/QUOTE]According to: [b]Phylogeographic Analysis of Haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y Chromosomes Reveals Multiple Migratory Events Within and Out Of Africa[/b] Somali have E3B* at 17 %, whereas San have E3b* at between 12% and 35%. [URL=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJHG/journal/issues/v74n5/40866/40866.html]read here[/URL] ^ note: i'm not trying to use Cruciani's new private nomenclatures because I don't understand it yet. So, if you are going to relate based on this, you will need to explain to me the exact relationship between Somilian and SouthEast African E3b, and how it cannot be linked to the autosomal affinities between Somalians and South/South East Africans. This is especially required if you are claiming that no such affinity exists...which is the bases for calling it a contradiction from Sforza, correct? [/qb][/QUOTE]I took my E3b* from a study on Somalis where it was found at 1.5%. Even with 17% from the study you took your figure from it makes no sense for San to cluster with Somalis, it would make a better case for Ethiopians since they share haplogroup A Ethiopians and or Bantu speakers, since they have E3a also. I made no claims that there wasn't any affinity, just that southern African San clustering closer to Somalis is spurious [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3