...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Anthropometric and genetic plots on Saharans and Sahelians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mystery Solver: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: I find nothing sarcastic about the sentence [i]"Rasol using Luis w/o including CI but MysterySolver doesn't mind."[/i] which is a mere statement of fact.[/QUOTE]It's what a person backed into the corner does, i.e. direct his/her frustration at other discussants for his/her incapacity to back up spurious claims, as if he/she is fooling anyone else but him/herself. [QUOTE]al Takruri: ...show the lack of evenhanded criticism on MS' part.[/QUOTE]Specifics & relevance to your obligation to support your spurious claim? [QUOTE]al Takruri: As for the moot topic, I'm quite content with my dovetailing of Arredi and Behrens regarding the expansion of North African NRY markers and spread of "Berber" language(s).[/QUOTE]Being content with a spurious claim, makes it no less illegitimate. [QUOTE]al Takruri: I stand by my proposition reposted 15 June, 2007 12:44 PM [/QUOTE]Trolls stand by the bogus propagation in the face of being bombarded with facts, but what is bogus shall remain [i]bogus[/i]. It doesn't help them. Your post reveals signs of this troll trait. [QUOTE] al Takruri: with its caveat pending further research on the possibility of a circa 1250 BCE eastflow of (an) NA marker(s) that corresponds to linguistics (North "Berber" spread from Tunisie/Tripolitania to Cyrenaica/western Egyptian Delta) and history (Meshwesh march on Egypt).[/QUOTE]E-M35 isn't a characteristic Tamazight expansion marker, nor is it of Neolithic extraction; nor was any such case put forward by the researchers you intentionally misquoted. [QUOTE]al Takruri: Studies of Libyan genetics would prove helpful but I cannot presently uncover any.[/QUOTE]You bet studies have been "uncovered" for you; all you have to now do, is to make the effortless task of simply reading, which you've thus far either chosen not to do, and/or else incapable of doing. [QUOTE]al Takruri: None of the hair splitting eledes either scholars' dates and they do so well match each other.[/QUOTE]Given that you've misquoted Arredi et al., which scholar supports your spurious claim about E-M35? [QUOTE]al Takruri: I highly value your insight Rasol. I again extend the offer to you, and all who write in the spirit of collaboration between colleagues, to present [b]data from any geneticists and linguists whose dates lineup so well[/b] as the two I chose. [/QUOTE]Already done. What remains to be done, is your ability to read it. Misquoting Arredi et al. is just sheer abuse of logic. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3