...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
comparing Egyptian to other Afroasiatic languages
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Kemson: The stupidity of anyone attempting, pretending and/or ignoring, or even denouncing the intimate and genetic relationship Black African languages like Niger-Congo/Bantu speaking family, share with languages of Ancient Kemet can never be overstated and should be struck down (almost with vengeance) at the sight of such attempts.[/QUOTE]Do you know of any modern linguists who deny interrelationships between African language families? Does this imply that logical sub-groups such as 'bantu' or 'semitic' do not exist? If you admit that Bantu language family exist and Semtitic language family exist, then isn't it possible that they may in turn be a part of larger and distinct groupings such as Niger Congo and Afrisan ? ? It's important to remember that language is not skin color. Would you agree that the Amharic language of Ethiopian Blacks is more closely related to Hebrew than to Zulu? One of the errors some Africanists make is the attempt to force-fit languages of Blacks into a singular catagory. [id Mandingo - Dravidian] Many if not most Hebrews are white, but their language is still more closely related to the languages of Blacks than it is to the language of other whites. It's interesting to note the vitroil spewed against Afrisan language group. It is simply because it's a language family that transgresses 'racial' boundaries? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3