...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
comparing Egyptian to other Afroasiatic languages
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Kemson: Would you agree that "the Amharic language of Ethiopian" may actually be or is one of the "Hebrew" languages of the Ancient and not the questionable Israeli Hebrew spoken in Israel today? [/QUOTE][b]No[/b] I wouldn't agree because Hebrew is a language, not a family of languages which may then subsume Amharic. Semitic does not equal Hebrew. Please cite a linguist who considers Amharic a "Hebrew" language? [QUOTE]Why does "the Amharic language of Ethiopian" have to "be closely realated" if it is Hebrew?[/QUOTE]According to linguists, Amharic is not Hebrew, they are two different, related languages. Again please cite a linguist to the contrary? [QUOTE]Why can't Zulu be a Hebrew languge?[/QUOTE]Because Hebrew is one language and Zulu is another. The case is not, as you apparently believe that Hebrew is any group of languages that you arbitrarily decide to call Hebrew. [QUOTE]One of the errors some Eurocentrics make is to categorize what they don't understand at all or enough and constantly shoot themselves in the foot by underestimate Black Africa's abilities to know their past.[/QUOTE]I agree. But how does this answer my questions? [QUOTE]In proving my point of unconscious racism...[/QUOTE]Interesting, I must of have missed this proof? So far instead of answering my questions, you asked other questions, which I have answered, while patiently awaiting answers to my own. Answering questions may be a form of proof. But dodging them, and then asking other questions instead, is certainly not. You've proven nothing, other than unwillingness or inability to answer my questions. [QUOTE]"It's important to remember that language is not skin color." Only to contradict yourself five lines later by writing: "Many if not most Hebrews are white...[/QUOTE]......[i][b]but[/b] their language is still more closely related to the languages of Blacks than it is to the language of other whites.[/i] The two sentenses support one another, they do not contradict one another, but you cut off half of the second sentense in order to label it a contradiction. tsk tsk. :rolleyes: The unaddressed point is that language families cannot necessarily be segrated by skin color. Evidently you admit this fact, and cannot refute it. Why else respond with polemical miscitation? [QUOTE]The fantasy idea that many or most Hebrews are White is dead wrong![/QUOTE]Then you can prove this? Does this statement depend upon calling Zulu's "Hebrews"? [QUOTE]It is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read.[/QUOTE]The statement is a hyperbole, when what is required is proof. [and answers] [QUOTE] Sorry buddy but your quotes are the hallmark of mis-education.[/QUOTE]Sorry but your post consists of flimsy emotional rhetoric which is meant to distract from your inability to answer my questions, so let me ask them again.... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3