...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT: R*-M173 back migration
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [QB] [QUOTE]Since the "back migration" idea is so offensive[/QUOTE]Please don't try to pawn off your [b]lack of evidence[/b] for your hypothesis on our being offended by it. After all, you are trying to attribute unspecified languages and cultural [influence] - a term you use to hide the lack of specifics, to Eurasian migrations into Africa, even though you lack direct linguistic, or anthropological, or archeological, or genetic evidence. When pressed on the matter you are essentially reduced to the observation that African languages are great in number and diversity and related in family as opposed to fragmented into isolates. We all agree on this - but do not see any evidence that it supports your hypothesis of "Eurasian" influence, be it genetic, archeological, linguistic or anthropological. Your hypothesis is weak. Our skepticism is fully justified. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3