...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Black-headed Sumerians and Black-headed Tut - a re-evaluation
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by blackman: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: It's crazy to juxapose black against Semitic. How do you appose a color to a language? On top of that continental Africa houses the majority of individual Semitic languages and those speakers there in the Horn are all BLACK N BEAUTIFUL with their Semitic selves. [/QUOTE]alTakruri, You misunderstand me. I'm not stating Semetic means non-black or non-african. I'm merely stating the Bible refered to the people of the region at that time as Hamatic. I'm well aware that Semetic originated in Afrcia and represents Black African People as well. History states the Akkad were semetic. The Bible state the Accad were Hamatic from the descendant of Canaan. That is were customs, looks, language, and DNA comes into play. That is why I asked about the genetics of other Semetic people today to see how related they are to Semetic people of Africa, even though semetic is a language and not DNA. However, no one answered. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3