...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Never-Ending Blabber
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Miguel Antunes: [QB] Exactly: "You also claim that Black African does not exist anyway, in which case their can be no definition for you to refer to in which case your reference to 'modern definition' makes no sense" Nor does your, or any other. My personal oppinion. I have already explained why "Black African" is a bad term to me. You don't think so, fine. I see now, that you aren't going to let go of that term, since it's dear to you (as is not using it dear to me). So arguing about it won't achieve nothing. Moving to the essential then: a) AE definition of Black? And why did they call themselves black? b) Are Black and Kemetian always the same thing in AE language? Or did they had other uses for the words? If so, what were they? c)Who else did AE called black? If at all? (You answered by saying the R.mt and the Nehesi, though you didn't explained what were they) c)What about other Africans AE knew about? d)What about those they didn't know about? If an AE were tranported to our time, what peoples would he label black? Why? Just curious. As it was said, including by me, none of these questions will change the fact that AE were native africans, and would be labeled black in Europe or the USA for example. Nor that they called themselves Black. P.S. None of what you just said disturbs me, in fact I find it fascinating. Also, don't quit your day job to pursue a career in psychology... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3