...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Never-Ending Blabber
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Miguel Antunes: [QB] "Wolof refer to themselves as Blacks, and Fulani Reds. Zulu refer to themselves as Blacks and San as red. Among some Nigerians darker individuals are referred to as Black and lighter are referred to as red" Interesting for sure. The rest of your post was mindless speculation and ad-hominem, unfortunately. "AE were Blacks" Sure, by their own definition and would be considered so by most people's definition today. (of course, it hasn't been established that their definition and any or all of the definitions that people have today are the same, and of course, black to me means nothing, but I am going by your rules) "were Africans". Of course, no doubt about it. "were Black Africans" By your definition for example, certanly. Though as I said to me Black African (or only Black) is as valid as Caucasoid or Negroid. Very, very little. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3