...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Mdu Ntr and Bantu
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mystery Solver: [QB] Cotonou's compilations of Obenga's comparative grammatic analysis was far from showing that ancient Egyptian was not related to other Afrasan languages. In fact, while he makes light of it, Obenga notes grammatic correlations between certain languages from different sub-Afrasan families. Obenga mainly hangs onto the idea that there are some grammatic differences between languages from different sub-Afrasan families, which should be obvious, because they were placed into distinct sub-families for a reason to begin with. That though, doesn't preclude the basic language affinities shared across the superfamily. I have demonstrated strong *grammatic* correlations between certain languages from distinct sub-Afrasan languages, not merely lexicons whose connections may or may not be tentative. At the end of the day, request for Obenga's *exhaustive* grammatic and lexical comparative analysis to obtain *genetic* [linguistically] justification for his typological construct of Negro-African superfamily, separate from Tamazight, Semitic, and perhaps Khoisan was never followed up with. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3