...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Tutankhamen DNA Results Revealed!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kalonji: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by commander flamboyant: Well, Talking to a robot would be easier than trying to communicate with you. [/QUOTE]You mean robotically saying the same irrelevant things allows you to ignore research, pretend to not have suffered scholarly beatdowns etc. even when its happening right in front of you? You said Hawass was certain, I quoted him above as saying that he is [b]almost certain[/b]. How our exchange (that seems to never have accessed rge tiny content in your skull), and more specifically, my citations, gels with ''never doing proper research'' is only understood in you spacey redneck head, Commander Flamboyant. [QUOTE]Originally posted by commander flamboyant: My question remains because you are uneducated and refuse to learn. [/QUOTE]Your question remains because your world view is distorted enough to not let the answer in. If your question cannot be answered when its right in front of you, I don't know what will. Also, this is not an issue of learning, KV55 could be Akhenaton, I'm keeping my options open while I'm waiting for conclusive evidence, that is what this is about. And a father/son relationship with KV55 and Tut + a father/son relationship with Amenhotep III and KV55 is not conclusive evidence that KV55 is Akhenaton. You know, people get more children, the thing they call brothers and sisters, ever heard of that? [QUOTE]Originally posted by commander flamboyant: What I am asking of you is what ANY liberal arts or Science department would ask if you were in their program. When you do research use current scholarship from top scholars in that field to make your case. [/QUOTE]You know what I read when you said that? uidliscldisuhclushasldjlcduli ;h;uhohsaohoas;jnsjnlsadncjas Because what you say is jibberish and has nothing to do with the fact that KV55 is still KV55. And that the only thing that is 100% certain, is that KV55 was the product of Amenhotep III and Tiye, and that Tut was the product of KV55. Expert speculation before this DNA test that Tut could've been the son of AmenhotepIII and the brother of Akhenaton is the only scenario that is 100% eliminated by this DNA test. The table does not say Akhenaton, and neither does his DNA contain his name as you previously implied. [QUOTE]Originally posted by commander flamboyant: is what I understand from you [/QUOTE]You understand nothing, douchebag, you can't even read that table, nor do you understand what your master Hawass has said: [QUOTE] Tutankhamun’s father was the “heretic” king, Akhenaten, whose body is now [b]almost certainly[/b] identified with the mummy from KV 55 in the Valley of the Kings, said Hawass, secretary general of Supreme Council of Antiquities. [/QUOTE]Kalonji [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3