...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
ISRAEL, MISRAH AND CANAAN IN CONTEXT: AFRICANS IN ARABIA Part I
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by anguishofbeing: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: [qb]Because you have a dislike of "Jews" does not mean however there were not historical people involved in these allegories.[/qb][/QUOTE]Never denied a people called "Jews" existed back then, just their stories/myths they made up about their origins. Whether these stories originated in Arabia is still in question. I think the evidence points to Egypt is the main source of these myths. [QUOTE]I’m not sure what to make of your comments about later Christians misinterpreting locations in the bible, so I’m assuming this is your answer to my New Testament quote in an attempt to discredit Matthew the author. If it is, it doesn’t even make sense, because no NT author including Matthew, is a ‘’later Christian’’. And to imply that Salibi knows better how to interpret the locations and nations referred to in the Old Testament authors than contemporaries of Jesus, is just ridiculous.[/QUOTE]The "authors" of the four gospels are not historical personages but four points of the Zodiac [Christianity before Christ, John G. Jackson]. They all contradict each other and they are drawn from Gnosticism, sun gods myths [especially Horus] and Greek mysteries of the time. There was no "contemporary of Jesus" as such a personage has never been proven to even exist. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3