...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Natufians were cold-adapted
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kalonji: [QB] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: Not at all, but I asked you how are you disqualifying these Natufians, why, and what are you disqualifying them from? Again point is Natufians were'nt homogenous and differing phenotypical characteristics amongst them doesn't make one more part of that Natufian culture than the next. [/QUOTE]I’m not going to go back and forth with you on this. My point is clear. I was disqualifying the conclusions drawn from one specific study that used two sets of skeletons from having anything to do (post cranially) with other studies that found their sample to be ethnically African, until it can be proven that said samples exhibited cold adapted limbs. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: Where did I make this assumption? I didn't. [b]And what do you mean by distinct phenotype?[/b] [/QUOTE]Read the last post from the previous thread. As a matter of fact, read the sources you claim to have used beside Brace and Trenton. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: They never ceased to be either, it seems you have a little trouble understanding. Natufians were a population with a physical blend of features (phenotypically) and a specific set of cultural traits, which is recognized as Natufian culture. [/QUOTE]YOU have trouble understanding. The samples used by Brace, Angel etc did NOT display a blend of features or cold adapted limbs. The fact of the matter is that these samples show that at time of burial, they were predominantly African, and that Trentons cold adapted limbs did not pertain to them. This was Truthcentrics question, and that is why I singled these samples out. If you think that equals ‘’trouble understanding’’ than that is YOUR derailing, and YOUR misplaced opinion of what this discussion is about. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: You have failed to show where the above would be incorrect, simply saying it is doesn't make it so. [/QUOTE]I have called you out on the fact that 4 specimen are not sufficient to label Natufians in general, similar to Brace’s Niger Congo speakers. I have also called you out on the fact that Brace’s sample was just a sample, and that were other ethnic groups present that did not display the traits you attribute to Natufians in your first post. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: …. Uses Christopher Ehret …..[/QUOTE]Who do you think you telling this to? I myself have referred to CE’s interview before, this is old news. What I asked you, and what you substituted for this old CE article is: [QUOTE] Originally posted by Kalonji: [b]Do your authors[/b] (Ehret, D 'Agostino) [b]give reverences[/b] where they got their [b]co-creation theory[/b] from? It seems that the archeologists on the ground, who have had live experience with the skeletons in question have a different story to tell regarding the relative lateness of the skeletons that bear African phenotypes.[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3